No way. The worst that could happen is extreme shame and embarrassment. The best that could happen is she is into me but I wouldn't want her to waste time with me when she could do a million times better. I like her enough that I wouldn't do that to her. Plus I would always be wondering when she is going to leave cause she came across someone better, since anyone with hair is better.
Best expression I ever read online
"Women are like floor tile..... lay them right the first time and you can walk all over them the rest of your life"
Just keep telling yourself that.
- - - Updated - - -
As I said, there are more women than men, bald men under 40 are a huge minority (is that what you menant to say?) so even the ones who don't like us will have to settle for a bald man. And yes, like being ginger, there has got to be an evolutionary advantage to it. As long as you don't have metabolic syndrome (which unfortunately 50% of the population do nowadays) baldness = high DHT which means strong erections, potent sperm, higher muscle and clearer thinking. 70% of men have DHT sensitive hair and go bald, we are being affected first because we have high DHT.
I love your use of the word settle. That basically says a woman will HAVE to choose you no matter how awful you are and like it. And WE ALL know how nice a pissy woman can be to her husband, I mean until a better looking guy comes along. She will settle for you until something nicer is there and then BAM divorce land and you are a sad, lonely, divorced man using all his income to pay child support for kids.
C'mon there is NO evolutionary advantage. There are just women who yes settle for less desirable men. NOW these women are also not usually the most attractive, nicest, sexiest and most fun women you will meet but hey if that's your digs then go for it.
I people watch, A LOT. I will say the majority of men bald (or unattractive for ANY reason)
"usually" have even LESS attractive women than themselves.... usually.
I did see a bald guy recently with a hot blonde but they were DEF from a european country and not the US here because of their language. Also I will say she was definitely checking me out as my hair was WAY better off than his, and he was DEF not liking it. SO if she was willing to oggle me then whats that say
1) about their relationship and how she views him until something better comes along
2) what would that say if she was dating me and someone with a sweeter head of hair came along.
Not to say she also wasn't looking at other factors, such as body type and face, everything is up for assumption.... and WE ALL KNOW what assuming does..... rigggggggggghhhhhhhhht?
If coco think there is a genetic benefit to balding let him, I can't argue it, its his piece of mind, al be it a very fragile one it seems. Yet also think coco..... perhaps men with the full head of hair are the evolutionary step. I will say in the past couple of generations balding has become a VERY ugly thing with the rise of celebrity status, social media, womens equality, and pop culture. Those who are bald are less physically desirable and usually try to hide it as such. Why would evolution create something "less" desirable to opposite sex? I would say this is why many guys with hairloss also try to land and knock up chicks young when its not as noticeable.
Again a bald man HAS NO MORE testosterone or DHT in his system than a guy with hair. Our hair is just systematically more sensitive to what we have.
Its like saying THIS guy
has more DHT than THIS guy
but perhaps he has less than THIS GUY
.......
OKAY I will just say Bruce willis or Jason S because I CAN NOT for the life of me find an image of a good looking naturally bald guy. They are all pics of buff norwood 1's with shaved heads.... so yeah I would say our generations are severly numbered.
I ask why ANYONE would decide to breed when they know they have severe hairloss? Its disgusting how selfish people can be that they would willingly pass that down.
GOT ONE!