baller234 said:
Why do you want to believe so badly that it doesn't?
I don't. But over the past week or so, you've thrown out a lot of ideas on this topic (both here and on HLH).
For example, you've talked about a certain level of androgen needed to 'activate the gene for Androgenetic Alopecia'. On HLH, it seemed as though you were proposing the idea that the right diet might prevent balding.
The first problem is that you overestimate the amount of androgen required. Women experience FPB and recession during adolescence with far less androgen than men. Men continue to bald throughout andropause as their free testosterone decreases. Also, younger men bald all throughout the normal range of total and free testosterone.
In the case of diet, you
might be able lower
total testosterone by 12-13% (Sources :
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15741266 http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=2512100) But only a small amount of free testosterone and DHT is reduced. There really isn't evidence to say that this modest reduction would substantially improve or prevent balding. Just because it might negatively influence BPH does NOT necessarily mean it influences Androgenetic Alopecia. You need direct evidence.
Also, there's the issue of how relevant circulating androgens are vs. localized androgens and 5-ar activity in the scalp itself, but Bryan covered that in the other thread.
baller234 said:
Listen I'm not advocating a drop all treatments and focus only on diet philosophy. What I'm saying is diet DOES influence the amount of hormones you produce.
To a small degree, yes. But unless you are proposing a scenario where a person is inducing hypogonadism (which is essentially what would be required) through diet, it's not going to stop balding. Even if that were possible, it would be stupid and dangerous.
I think we know the limits of what can, with relative safety, be achieved through manipulation of circulating androgen. It's simply not a case of 'lower is better' (unless you are transgendered).