- Reaction score
- 1,108
That's just my theory after reading and re-reading much stuff the past months. Stemson's approach could achieve resistant follicles or easily as well NOT. I think I mentioned why so in the post history of this thread as well."Does this mean they try to make the follicle permanent and not susceptible to Androgenetic Alopecia!? This would match then with the Fortunis guy, making claims that it will give a natural density/hairline, that the hair will stay permanently and won't bald ever. Someone remember that phrase and can elaborate it!? "
We need more papers, details and studies to understand it better. And a proper statement from the team if it is INDEED RESISTANT.