- Reaction score
- 507
Oh Boo f*****g hoo, cry more ya sensitive Nancy
So, Here We Are, Q2 2018 But Where Has Shiseido Gone?
- Thread starter Timii
- Start date
I would love to roast you but my saturday is to valuable.
A) Wrong. It was in Germany.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01286649
Sponsor:
TrichoScience Innovations, Inc.
Collaborators:
Pharmalog Institut für klinische Forschung GmbH (PHARMALOG Institute for Clinical Research)
PRA Health Sciences
Innovacell Biotechnologie AG
DatInf (Germany)
The Hair and Skin Research and Treatment Center
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
RepliCel Life Sciences, Inc. ( TrichoScience Innovations, Inc. )
B) True, but your lack of knowledge on new Autologous Stemcell Laws in USA have you assuming things are behind schedule, instead of just having changed course... I could elborate, but your not worth my time.
C) Link your source... by the way 8% regrowth is not "substantial" by any means for you or other late Norwood. For full hairline diffuse thinners its a
functional "cure"
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/416100424.html
Keep disliking my posts though, you dont seem but hurt at all lol.
- Reaction score
- 520
lmao
- Reaction score
- 460
A) I said that the trial was conducted on Georgians, not that the trial was conducted in Georgia. The center was, indeed, in Germany but the "patients" were all Georgian citizens.
B) Nonsense!
C) Links? You need links? Just watch all Replicel's CEO's newest interviews and videos. There aren't too many. You can do this, I believe in you.
A) Ok... So you making that distinction was 100% unnecessary and irrelevant in the first place in your initial response to me; as I said the "German Safety Trials" which as you stated where done in GERMANY lmfao goof ball!! Just like if I called it "United States Safety Trials", would your goofy self feel the need to be specific as to the ethnicity of the participants? lol.
B) Nonsense? Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with? Really? Smh. Goyim.
C) Why do I need to watch interviews when I have spoken on the very subject with Lee Buckler him self extensively? The reason they are moving away from making such bold statements is they rather let the results speak for themsleves. They realize full blown baldites like you are not going to go from NW66 to a NW0, and want to save you from such expectations. They do not want to be held responsible for a mass increase in suicide rates from clowns like you having unrealistic expectations.(Not really, its about investor expectations, but that does not concern a labourer like yourself)
D) I didnt know the loss of hair follicles was related to a loss of brain cells, thanks for confirming! lmao
hahaha
B) Nonsense? Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with? Really? Smh. Goyim.
C) Why do I need to watch interviews when I have spoken on the very subject with Lee Buckler him self extensively? The reason they are moving away from making such bold statements is they rather let the results speak for themsleves. They realize full blown baldites like you are not going to go from NW66 to a NW0, and want to save you from such expectations. They do not want to be held responsible for a mass increase in suicide rates from clowns like you having unrealistic expectations.(Not really, its about investor expectations, but that does not concern a labourer like yourself)
D) I didnt know the loss of hair follicles was related to a loss of brain cells, thanks for confirming! lmao
hahaha- Reaction score
- 460
LMAOA) Ok... So you making that distinction was 100% unnecessary and irrelevant in the first place in your initial response to me; as I said the "German Safety Trials" which as you stated where done in GERMANY lmfao goof ball!! Just like if I called it "United States Safety Trials", would your goofy self feel the need to be specific as to the ethnicity of the participants? lol.
B) Nonsense? Is that the best rebuttal you can come up with? Really? Smh. Goyim.
C) Why do I need to watch interviews when I have spoken on the very subject with Lee Buckler him self extensively? The reason they are moving away from making such bold statements is they rather let the results speak for themsleves. They realize full blown baldites like you are not going to go from NW66 to a NW0, and want to save you from such expectations. They do not want to be held responsible for a mass increase in suicide rates from clowns like you having unrealistic expectations.(Not really, its about investor expectations, but that does not concern a labourer like yourself)
D) I didnt know the loss of hair follicles was related to a loss of brain cells, thanks for confirming! lmao
A) The Georgian "patients" had their treatment in Georgia. No German patients were tested. A Replicel guy even explained that due to delays and products' impairment at transfer the treatment turned out to be ineffective for a couple of patients.
B) I just gave a reality check. A phase II clinical trial was supposed to have commenced already and hasn't yet. Your response was nonsensical.
C) I don't know and don't really care about what Lee Buckler has told ya. All I know is that they had talked about substantial hair neogenesis in the beginning and have ceased making such claims for quite some time.
Ps. I can't help but pity you. You must live a miserable life.
A) What does any of that have to do wit hthe actual data that came out of Phase 1? Again your redirecting the arugement form the facts and data to some pissing match about the exact location of the trials... Anyone can see that I would not be incorrect to assume Germany based on involvement of the German companies that actually ran the trials.... Big whoop I got the exact location off.... So what? What does that change? The fact it was done on a group of people with arguably the worst hair genetics on earth only strengthens the resolve....
B) How was my response non-sensical. I just told you if you could take the time to read which must be so difficult with the lack of brain cells... errrm I mean Hair Follicles; you would see that stem cell therapies that involove patients own autologous stem cells in the US only need to be registered with the FDA but do not need to pass through the traditional 1-3 trials goof ball lol. But again a Goy Laborer would not need to know such things lol
C) Good to know you refute the facts I just told you "I don't know and don't really care about what Lee Buckler has told ya" pretty much sums up your entire state of mind. Youre probably an Antifa fruitloop lmao!! When you run a public company and make unsubstantiated claims about future outlook or product deliverability without proof you get moved onto the "clown" list; you know the section of the yearbook you constantly find yourself in lmaoo!
"I can't help but pity you. You must live a miserable life." awww how cute, an Incel who dislikes all of my posts feels pity for me lmaoooo haha. Too funny. Yes, my life is soooo awful I cant even begin to explain to you....
Its okay little buddy, hang in there; we're all gunna make it bruh!
All jews?
- Reaction score
- 1,321
George Soros is. What is your point?
You seem like the type that cries himself to sleep bcs you’re bald
- Reaction score
- 1,253
You're on a balding site. If that's a problem you should join some other website...
Desmond_84
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 359
Hi guys, I had a bit of spare time today and decided to run some searches on Shiseido to see if there's any new updates in Japanese media. Unfortunately, I've come across some worrying information that seems to have gone under our radar and Replicels.
Two Japanese news pages have stated in late 2017 that Shiseido is now aiming for 2020 market release rather than 2018. Here's the excerpts:
"Regarding hair regeneration medicine under development by Shiseido, clinical trials have already started at Tokyo Medical University and Toho University. The Shiseido side initially stated that he would like to put it in practical use so that it can be widely used for treating alopecia in 2018, but now it seems that the target is 2020. It seems that Riken and Kyocera 's hair regenerative medicine are aiming for practical use until 2020."
Source: https://hageken.jp/
Publication date: 7 Nov 2017
"In addition, Kyocera is announced that it is advancing research while making technical collaboration with RIKEN, and it is expected to be commercialized in 2020 as well as Shiseido."
Source: https://www.francetop.com/
Publication date: 11 Nov 2017
How did we miss this! We really need to get in contact with Dr Ryoji Tsuboi (the lead principal investigator). His email is: tsuboi@tokyo-med.ac.jp
This is very worrying indeed.
Two Japanese news pages have stated in late 2017 that Shiseido is now aiming for 2020 market release rather than 2018. Here's the excerpts:
"Regarding hair regeneration medicine under development by Shiseido, clinical trials have already started at Tokyo Medical University and Toho University. The Shiseido side initially stated that he would like to put it in practical use so that it can be widely used for treating alopecia in 2018, but now it seems that the target is 2020. It seems that Riken and Kyocera 's hair regenerative medicine are aiming for practical use until 2020."
Source: https://hageken.jp/
Publication date: 7 Nov 2017
"In addition, Kyocera is announced that it is advancing research while making technical collaboration with RIKEN, and it is expected to be commercialized in 2020 as well as Shiseido."
Source: https://www.francetop.com/
Publication date: 11 Nov 2017
How did we miss this! We really need to get in contact with Dr Ryoji Tsuboi (the lead principal investigator). His email is: tsuboi@tokyo-med.ac.jp
This is very worrying indeed.
hanginginthewire
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1,427
It could be that they’re conflating Tsuji with Shiseido, I mean timeframe wise.
But if not it’s no surprise. And guess what, in 2020, it will be pushed back again. Same sh*t, different day.
- Reaction score
- 452
This. Nothing has been announced from Shiseido about a release period. This is a news report and my take was they are simply applying the Riken Kyocera time line to Shiseido's RCH-01.
Just wait for the phase II results, if they are positive, I bet you they will launch in 2018/early 2019.
Yup but arent they supposed to be published in Q2 2018, I'm pretty sure considering the date that they wont be