Why does it matter if it's "modern science" or not? If we know the follicles are not fully dead then it clearly can be reversed.
Modern science can do many things that natural cures cannot. Re-attaching severed limbs. Open body surgery without dying of infection. Etc.
Let's weigh the evidence for & against an unknown natural treatment (that is worth using):
One one side, the last 10,000 years of human civilization has not been able to find anything. And on the other side, with the benefit of modern research, there is . . . zip. Nothing been found. There still isn't even any evidence to suggest it might exist.
One could say "it's impossible to prove a negative" but IMO the case for the negative is pretty strong here.
I absolutely do believe mankind will invent a better treatment in the next few decades. But it's gonna require something that was not available to mankind until recently.
Last edited: