There is almost no doubt in my mind that RU is more harmful on average then finasteride and no where near as effective long-term. That is why it wasn't developed fully, because it wouldn't touch finasteride on the market, just like Kintor's pryalutamide is not going to replace finasteride either.Why on earth would they spend the money to develop a new topical drug when the results are comparable to an existing oral pill?
After all, the oral pill has essentially no side-effect problem, right? Isn't that what the Finasteride research says?
This is why I get so frustrated when grown intelligent adults keep denying Finasteride's common side-effect problem. That mistaken idea isn't only annoying. It has been VERY HARMFUL to us. We could have all been using commercial RU for the last 15+ years already. (That means real RU, not some counterfeit unstable junk from a Chinese meth lab.)
There is just enough fear mongering about finasteride on the internet to lead the market for a weaker topical to grow significantly since RU trials in the early 2000s.
