Hi.
Darn the picture is not showing up on my browser..
Zimmy thanks for the links.. actually that seatlerock guy.. Ive seen those pictures everywhere.. Theres a lot of controversy about them.. And no matter the case.. whatever it is.. this is some kind of rare/freak occurence.. In any event.. taking all those drugs as old as he is.. he definitely is going to be Fucked later in life in MY OPINION..
Out of everything, you know what impressed me the most? On regrowth.com under the propecia page, they show a photo of a before and after photo of someones progress during the clinical trials.. Yet when you click on clinical trial photos, or go to propecia.com and look at clinical trial photos, you dont see anything that significant.. What im trying to say is.. Its pretty odd that the picture on regrowth, someone who supposedly is from the clinical trials, would not be posted on the propecia web site, since it shows better results then the pictures they do have posted.. That to me is pretty fishy.. The pictures on propecia's website seem very realistic of what that particular drug alone can do. The picture on regrowth seems false... because if someone from the clinical trials showed that much regrowth.. It would only be common sense that propecia would post that picture under the extreme results that only a very small percentage of people experienced.
Bruce when you show anger, it just proves that what I am saying your taking time to comment, and its frustrating you. Especially when after all our discussion you make a comment that denounces your previous arguments.. and I set that up intentionally.. So you then resort to the typical I have no facts, im a retard, no scientific base.. etc. Bottom line of my posts was to question things a little, and explain things arent as clear cut as people make it out to be.. You go on to argue that im being retarded since there is all this HARDCORE DATA, and how you keep stressing the FDA, FDA, FDA, and argue about the accuracy, and honesty of FDA findings.. yet in another argument you denounce an FDA model, and claim that the FDA came out with something due to a correlation between the FDA and grain producers.. right there alone you are admitting that not everything the FDA does, or sponsors is Gods word.. But you brought up a specific example of how the FDA could have been influenced by BIG BUSINESS.. and that was my whole point from the start.. So i suggest you just give up.. and stop digging a deeper hole. even though it is easier to do when everyone is on your side of the fence trying to make an a**h** out of just one person. You can gang rape me all you want, everyone can call me a shmuck, but i know that anyone with a reasonable open mind, would see some truth to the babbling I have done..