Aplunk1
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 9
Taugenichts said:I am struggling words to describe your post. The best ones I can find are censored here......
First of all, I didn´t give this advice to a "young, vulnerable" member but to Aplunk who is a hairloss veteran and has more than 3000 posts. Though this doesn´t make a big difference to me, I tell the truth to everyone.
Second, Aplunk is never, never a "clear Norwood 1/1.5". He is at least a Norwood 2, I would say he is a Norwood 2.5. His hairloss is very obvious to those with a trained eye (you aren´t one of them.....)
Third, the reason why I choose so drastic words is that the posters before me where telling stupid $#iT such as they can´t see any hair loss. I think it is my moral duty to step in when people are being fooled in such an obvious way.
Fourth, calling my opinion "utterly wrong" is more $#iT. Anyone who considers Aplunk near a NW1 has proven how much he knows about hairloss and hence is "utterly wrong".
You know I see this as a general problem in this forum. People are not interested in telling the truth but rather to make the others feel better. To me this is not the point of this forum. This is exactly why I don´t believe people when they are telling me that I am normal looking. But then again, they compare me to old men and yes, seen like that I am not ugly......
Thank you Tauge,
was asa846 definitely speaking about me, or was he talking about another "Norwood 1.5".
In any case, Tauge, I do appreciate your input. I think that you're right, actually. What most people do NOT see is the temporal recession that isn't necessarily available in the photos I provided. The Rogaine "fuzz" that exists in the Norwood 2.5 area includes very small hairs, which do very little for me. The photos can cover up quite a bit.
Tauge, you do have a good eye when it comes to hairloss, and I do appreciate your opinion.
I feel that I'm probably within the Norwood 2.5 range but considered a Norwood 1.5 with because of the small Rogaine hairs. With some recent shedding, covering my crown is becoming more difficult, which makes me believe that I probably fit in between the Norwood 2-3 range.
In any case, I just thought I should add to your post.