Thank you Tauge, was asa846 definitely speaking about me, or was he talking about another "Norwood 1.5". In any case, Tauge, I do appreciate your input. I think that you're right, actually. What most people do NOT see is the temporal recession that isn't necessarily available in the photos I provided. The Rogaine "fuzz" that exists in the Norwood 2.5 area includes very small hairs, which do very little for me. The photos can cover up quite a bit. Tauge, you do have a good eye when it comes to hairloss, and I do appreciate your opinion. I feel that I'm probably within the Norwood 2.5 range but considered a Norwood 1.5 with because of the small Rogaine hairs. With some recent shedding, covering my crown is becoming more difficult, which makes me believe that I probably fit in between the Norwood 2-3 range. In any case, I just thought I should add to your post.