That's a sweet thing to say. However, I'm (a young) 52, so if I were single, the traits to which I'd be attracted wouldn't be the same as those to which EvilLocks would be. Young people put far more emphasis on looks than older ones do.
Hi Joan. Sorry I took so long to get back to you. I've been busy with the holidays and I'm really focused on SM04554. I could be wrong but I think SM04554 will be a breakthrough treatment. I'm not saying that I believe it will give us all full heads of hair but I do believe it will be better than minoxidil + propecia. Samumed seems excited about SM04554 and Samumed says the phase 2 results indicate that SM04554 should proceed (in clinical trials). Why would they think that if SM04554 was not an improvement over the two drugs (rogaine 5% + propecia) that are already available?
Anyway, there are two reasons I don't hold it against women that they're disinterested in bald men. Firstly, I believe that nature set it up for women to favor attractive men because attractive men made better mates (back then) since attractive men are usually younger, and therefore stronger and healthier. Nature was really trying to steer women towards stronger and healthier men and accomplished this by steering her towards attractive men. Secondly, I know that men are more interested in attractive women than unattractive women. This is something that both genders are doing to each other.
All of that having been said, while it's not our fault that we're prejudice against unattractive people some people can and do rise above various prejudices so it can be done. Just because nature says that it's OK for us to neglect unattractive people doesn't mean that doing so is not hurtful. And just because nature says it's OK to neglect people who don't get to be beautiful doesn't mean that it's a nice thing to do. I think we should all understand and accept that it is in our nature to neglect unattractive people because that's how nature set up human interaction. And I think that being disinterested in people just because they're unattractive is something we should try to outgrow, the same as we are trying to outgrow other kinds of prejudice. If we don't try to outgrow this prejudice then we are allowing nature, a non-thinking force, to steer us ON NATURE'S PATH INSTEAD OF OUR OWN PATH like we're a bunch of unintelligent cows or sheep.
When push comes to shove we're all just human beings and nobody is better than anyone else just because he/she is more attractive than another person. Nature is telling us to believe attractive people are "better" because nature wants to steer us towards younger, healthier, and stronger people, but having younger healthier mates is not as important today as it was hundreds of thousands of years ago when the human environment was wild, dangerous, and laborious.
And besides, in the near future attractive people and unattractive people will ALL live longer and healthier lives because regenerative medicine is on the near horizon so nature's master-plan to prompt people to select attractive mates BECAUSE THEY'RE HEALTHIER has outlived its' usefulness. The days of having to select attractive mates in order to get healthier mates are almost over. For example, progressive arteriosclerosis is the number one killer of both men and women and amazing breakthrough treatments for this condition are starting to reach the marketplace now.
- - - Updated - - -
My ex always complained about her boobs being too small (and her legs looking like tree trunks). It never even phased me, I could never understand why she was self conscious about her 'imperfections' when she had me being attracted to every aspect of her.
because she wanted other men to be attracted to her too.
- - - Updated - - -
I won't settle for anything smaller than natural DD breasts.
DD is too big. And what does it matter if they aren't natural? Unnatural and natural look similar if done by a quality surgeon.
- - - Updated - - -
I'm sure she had a pretty face too, but at 50, I doubt she looks as good first thing in the morning. I'd rather my body age than my face if I had a choice.
Is that because when a person is out in public the body is concealed but not the face????
And I'm not saying something negative about your face. I have no idea what you look like. I'm just trying to determine the logic behind your statement that you would rather your body age than your face.
I am sure you are in good company on here with others who don't want to confess their secrets about their private life. For some reason, I think alot of us have confessed certain things about ourselves that normally we would never do in public. I guess like AA, we can remain anonymous here too and share our "stories".
