Brutal. Trust me. It's going to be exactly that. Use logical comprehension and you'll understand it. Especially after reading that particular document.
"There is also a clinical study conducted by a third party academic group which validates the approach that Follica plans on pursuing, which the Directors believe is covered by Follica’s intellectual property. The company is currently planning a fourth human study to begin in 2016."
Lol, follica even thinks that R. Dhurat study falls under their IP.
But don't you think they would be exposed by someone if they're marketing their treatment as New when it already exists? Furthermore, how closely is their data related to that study you said? And did that study create follicles?