Neither one of them lied. I somehow can't explain this to you, so you CAN understand.so it was a lie? or Alexey lied this fortunis guy? come on lets be serious
Yes you are right, everyone is lying to everyone. Matter of fact there is no Stemson it is all a hocus pocus and stem cells is fake too. Fortnuis, Alexey, EVERYONE is lying to you froggy, you got it!so it was a lie? or Alexey lied this fortunis guy
i think we find out this in 10 years, or longer, when some people will have thiese hair on teir heads
Frog why was hairlicously censoring you
i do not know
but i dont care, i dont why i was banned here twice?
Those slides didnt help us one bit they made it a joke especially the ones with Gru.
The Gru was used as light humour. The slides towards the end showed how the lolli-up would contain both the DP + epithelial cells and how each lolli-up will be placed in the scaffold showing growth of hair follicles in the base with 3 cycles minimum. I don’t understand how the visual didn’t help you understand or how it was a joke?
You get a like just for your creative screen name that is a refreshing difference from Ashes_to_Ashes_NW7 or lifeisover_nw10
wow, see i didn't know he had an official position with them like that, i'd say this is all a good indicator stemson more like is a decade away, as opposed to the 4-6 years figure we sometimes hear bandied about. i hope to be proven wrong and for stemson to hit the market sooner, but looking like we gotta be patient
unless someone here or on follicle thought has a super insider connection to stemson that is, but seems unlikely
Alexey did mention he thinks hair cloning would be available around 2023/2024 earliest. I think it will be around 2025/2026
sounds like mcandrews is heavily involved with stemson. so either he just says ten years to be super conservative or, again, we gotta be patient and that's the timeline we're looking at, not five years. it's interesting that follice thought just recently posted 2027 as their estimated market launch for stemson. i don't have a special relationship with mcandrews. he gave me info he'd give anyone. so either mcandrews says 10 years as a very rough estimate or follice thought, no offense cause i appreciate that blog generally speaking, hasn't done its homeworkStemson Therapeutics Forms Scientific and Medical Advisory Board : Stemson Therapeutics
A Radical Solution for Hair Growthstemsontx.com
Dr. Chaffoo is a leading plastic surgeon, founder of La Jolla Plastic Surgery & Dermatology, and one of the top hair transplant surgeons in California. He has supported hair growth research in Dr. Terskikh’s lab for the last three years by donating patient hair follicles. Dr. Paul McAndrews is a Dermatologist, Professor of Dermatology at USC School of Medicine, a published expert in hair transplant surgeries, and runs his own hair transplant clinic in Pasadena, CA. Drs. Chaffoo and McAndrews will guide the Stemson management team in the design of the cell transplantation procedure and the human clinical trial, as well as guide the Stemson teams understanding of the hair loss patient population.
Geoff Hamilton did say that this year was meant to be the start of clinical trials (of course COVID did get in the way) so based off of that I'm positive next year will be when clinical trials will commence so 10 years does sound like a long stretch. Another point is that if Stemson were to take 10 years let's say, they wouldn't be funded by their investors unless they were to produce significant results in that meantime. Meaning that money wouldn't be constantly supplied to them in that period of time unless viable results were shown. Plus their patent would run out in that time frame.
interesting, it's great to get more info and open up the conversation like this. i'm personally wondering about it all because when stemson hits market, i'm happy to say i should have the money to afford it right there in the beginning, even if it's six figures. so i've been thinking about getting a regular transplant soon, enjoy the results for several years, then get stemson. but i kind of pitched that to mcandrews, and he advised me to just wait it out––i have hair now, but i do want better density and believe i'm thin enough where it'd make a marked difference. maybe i wasn't clear enough, or maybe he just operates from position that cloning is only a theory until it's finally for real. just not sure why from what i said he wouldn't have told me, no promises, but we might be looking at 5-7 years. he very clearly said 10. but i think i remember him saying 5 years last year! so it's a bit confusing...