- Reaction score
- 72
Short Or Bald Men. Who Do You Think Has It Worse?
- Thread starter dancingkpopchick
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 228
Of course height is an advantage but I'd take being 5'6 with a model tier face over being 6'3 with an average face. Face wins over everything.
1.84CM? That's kinda short...
Okay, if you say so, from where i come from it's kind of tall, i don't know what scale of comparison you are using...
Keyword: CM meaning centimetres
Except money. There's no panty peeler like being rich af.
That's why I'm always irritated when people point out wealthy and famous bald guys with gorgeous women, ain't the bald head she likes, it's his fame, status and money.
- Reaction score
- 228
All the money in the world can't buy genuine attraction like an attractive face can though.
- Reaction score
- 129
I think money can give you nice clothes , car , cariama and confidence which is a big part of attraction , that it can buy fit hookers and fit gold diggers .
- Reaction score
- 129
No it’s not
- Reaction score
- 129
lol half a inch is short your correct my bad
- Reaction score
- 228
Paying for sex is depressing though no matter how attractive the girl. And why would I want to be with a gold digger knowing the whole time she's only putting up with me because of money? I'd rather kill myself.
If you're not attractive all the nice clothes and fast cars in the world won't make a girls p*ssy wet. Having an attractive face will though.
Call me a cynic, a sexist, incel, douche bag, but like it or not all relationships boil down to trading sex for other things. She gives you sex, you give her money (directly or indirectly) attention, protection, status, something. Women never love you for you, it's always about what you can do for them.
Honestly, that's what I would want in a relationship... I would want to be given stuff in exchange for whatever they want to do to me, although that does sound kinda sugar daddyish
Men are the same way, but it's easier to figure out what we want, usually sex. That's why people enter into relationships, it's about what they get out of it. Even your dog will run off if he isn't fed. Only children are loved unconditionally.
The less real love there is, the more it becomes a trade deal. If you truly love someone you also don't care about giving them whatever makes them happy (within a certain degree of sanity), which is something that is the same for men and women. And yes, women can love you for you,which in all healthy relationships tends to be the case. I am sorry to hear that your personal experience is different.
Well yes I agree with the idea that in a good relationship courtship should not stop. You also should not want that. Oterhwise you just become roommates. I just don't agree with generalizations that only children can be love unconditionally, or that women cannot truly love you
No, in your previous posts you made the giving part in a relationship sound like a chore or a trading agreement. If I truly love someone and that person truly loves me, it does not feel like that most of the time.
Short is worse I think. I think being bald is a little exaggerated a lot of times because a lot of girls dont care a ton about looks. Girls simply dont work like men as much as men constantly send them dic pics they dont want. Girls dont get visually turned on the same way men do, but men constantly think because of p**rn that it works like that. p**rn is not real life. If women worked like men sexually there would be people have sex 24/7 everywhere all the time. Girls would be sleeping with hundreds of guys like men try to do with girls. Its just clearly not the case