I agree with you on that and they do need to publish the data (I assume they're waiting on the 60 month data so they can update the study data at once instead of doing it twice within a few weeks). And after that we need to have the Shisedo data and we need to actually try out the treatment.
I'm just saying we don't know where they didn't respond or just lost more hair than they regrew, so you can't claim they're non-responders. of course you can take the rational approach and be skeptical, but you do need to mention that we're not certain whether regrowth is achieved or not.
Another thing I'd like to mention is that I can't see why, when given multiple injections, it wouldn't regrow any new hairs. Considering it grows hairs on human arms and mouse ears, I think it's a reasonable assumption that it will also be able to grow hair on scalp with fibrosis.
I'm just saying we don't know where they didn't respond or just lost more hair than they regrew, so you can't claim they're non-responders. of course you can take the rational approach and be skeptical, but you do need to mention that we're not certain whether regrowth is achieved or not.
Another thing I'd like to mention is that I can't see why, when given multiple injections, it wouldn't regrow any new hairs. Considering it grows hairs on human arms and mouse ears, I think it's a reasonable assumption that it will also be able to grow hair on scalp with fibrosis.