- Reaction score
- 2,720
I understand your skepticism, but I’m of the opinion that you shouldn’t knock it until you try it. You’ve made an argument appealing to an Invalid population here. I agree that it doesn’t look good that only one to try it has had success, but the trial sample we have here favours the 1% of total nonresponders. If we recruited a more even distribution of great,Don't get me wrong I enjoy the facts and I'm mot disputing them you are completely missing my point here, you are just recycling wiki and other internet info which others are too lazy to do in turn you look to be a knowledgeable person in this area couple that with the fact you are saying you are getting results (despite telling people try at your own risk) you know members will be all over that you know how desperate they are. It hasn't worked for anyone perhaps its one of those things in life where it sounds great in theory but doesn't work as well in practice. Now you have the opportunity to actually definitively say yeah its working here are my before and after pictures just like anyone would expect after making such claims...I just think its wrong misleading weak people especially with a potentially dangerous chemical
I thinks its admirable you come to your buddy's rescue however ive tried one thing and have never shitted on it for working or not working far from jaded get your facts right again you clearly missed the point
moderate and poor responders, then we would have a clearer picture of how this actually works for the greater majority of Androgenetic Alopecia sufferers. However we do not. Sure, it could be that you’re another failure case, but by the sounds you are just another 1 percenter. We can apply the same principles to every single current treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia. I myself can say “No, this does not work FOR ME”, but I hesitate to say to anyone considering it “but don’t try it because it’s like that for everyone”, because we simply don’t have the sort of data.