ryan r said:Looks good. NW2/NW2-
amsch said:OMG you guys have no clue what the Norwood scale is about. Really. Norwood 2? WTF, than how does a Norwood 0 (non balding) look like?
@op: you're a Norwood 1 MAX.
ryan r said:amsch said:OMG you guys have no clue what the Norwood scale is about. Really. Norwood 2? WTF, than how does a Norwood 0 (non balding) look like?
@op: you're a Norwood 1 MAX.
LOL, what you´re talking about?
There isnt even a NW0.
NW1 means no recession, he has recession, not too much, so thats why I said NW2/NW2-.
But whatever your Norwood is, it doesnt really matter. What matters is that your hair looks good!
I have about the same hairline, but I am thinning as well, so thats sucks.
amsch said:ryan r said:amsch said:OMG you guys have no clue what the Norwood scale is about. Really. Norwood 2? WTF, than how does a Norwood 0 (non balding) look like?
@op: you're a Norwood 1 MAX.
LOL, what you´re talking about?
There isnt even a NW0.
NW1 means no recession, he has recession, not too much, so thats why I said NW2/NW2-.
But whatever your Norwood is, it doesnt really matter. What matters is that your hair looks good!
I have about the same hairline, but I am thinning as well, so thats sucks.
There is no NW0?
![]()
Norwood 1 is the first stage. You want to tell me that a Norwood 1 in the above scale is a full hairline? And this guy is a Norwood 2? I guess you're refering to another scale. :dunno:
rapt123 said:Thank you for the answers guys. My temples look worse in here:
![]()
Thickandthin said:rapt123 said:Thank you for the answers guys. My temples look worse in here:
![]()
You have a small amount of recession but a very strong hairline.
There's a very good chance your hair has looked like this for a long time and you are just now noticing it![]()
amsch said:OMG you guys have no clue what the Norwood scale is about. Really. Norwood 2? WTF, than how does a Norwood 0 (non balding) look like?
@op: you're a Norwood 1 MAX.
