- Reaction score
- 4,891
Not much you can do about that - its genetic.
But they have looksmaxed their bodies into the highest echelon of male beauty.
What Is Looks Matched Anyways (word Count)
- Thread starter samantha3333
- Start date
But they have looksmaxed their bodies into the highest echelon of male beauty.
- Reaction score
- 5,713
Before:
After:
Don't smoke, kids!
After:
Don't smoke, kids!
- Reaction score
- 4,891
Good call on Eric Bana.Man crushes
Who's the last one? I don't see the attraction myself.
- Reaction score
- 8,866
It isn't about you can do it or no.
It is about aesthetic its or no.
I find Tyson Ballou body is much more aesthetic than Gandy's.
EvilLocks
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,530
EvilLocks
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,530
Before:
After:
Don't smoke, kids!
It's sad actually… He is ageing quite badly, and I am someone who doesn't mind a bit of wrinkles on a man. But he's late 30's and looks at least 10 years older.
- Reaction score
- 4,891
This is my ultimate goal and the perfect bodyPerfect in my eyes
What does a better male body look like?
- Reaction score
- 8,866
Perfect in my eyes
What does a better male body look like?
Tried to find and bumped into this LOL
F A C E
I liked body of Daredevil (Charlie Cox) but couldn't find a proper pic.
resu
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 1,339
Tried to find and bumped into this LOL
F A C E
I liked body of Daredevil (Charlie Cox) but couldn't find a proper pic.
With a face like that what's the point in taking selfies?
EvilLocks
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 5,530
Tried to find and bumped into this LOL
F A C E
I liked body of Daredevil (Charlie Cox) but couldn't find a proper pic.
They are excellent bodies, but I still like Gandy (prime) the most.
There are a few things you can do to get such a job:
(1) I am not sure what field you work in but it's a good idea to develop skills for which there is a huge demand but not enough supply. Software development is one such a field. There are more jobs than people available here in the US. Consequently, there are many high paying and lucrative opportunities. Employers also treat you a lot better as you are not easily replaceable.
(2) Look for a stable corporation that is renowned for work-life balance. That's the first thing that I look when I apply for a job. You can often get a glimpse of an organizations culture by reading reviews on website such as glassdoor. Be willing to come to a nice compromise with salary. I can probably make substantially more money if I stop caring about work/life balance. Working in a stable organization is very important as job security gives you peace of mind. I avoid industries like oil/gas as they are not very stable. I work in an insurance organization. Non profit , government or academic jobs are usually more relaxed but expect low pay. But you will have peace of mind and job security. My current organization is a nice compromise as it functions like a government agency but with pay scale of private organizations.
(3) If possible, work for a large corporation. Small companies(less than 100 employees) have too much micro management and expect a lot out of you. Avoid working for start ups unless you are just out of college and in need of some experience. Find an organization that has 5000+ employees. I had excellent experience working for an organization that had 5000 employees. My current organization has 65,000. However, the culture of organization is very important as well. So you may find an organization with 5000+ employees but cut throat culture. I worked for an organization that had 1500 employees but very supportive culture.
(4) During the interview, try to get a feel for the company. Does the manager seem nice and easy to get a long with? Does the company culture strive for work life balance?
(5) If you are a software engineer, avoid working for software companies unless you feel like the culture is nice. Otherwise you may end up being surrounded by extreme nerds who love programming so much that they stay up till 2 am in the night reading tech blogs and developing software for fun. You don't want to be surrounded by such people as you will be judged according to their performance.
- Reaction score
- 6,504
I hope we will all see the attraction some day.
- Reaction score
- 11,938
The last one is Dr. Tsuji, who will bring back all of our hair one day !
How did you not recognize him from half the avatars on this forum? lol.
- Reaction score
- 4,602
Perfect in my eyes
What does a better male body look like?
- Reaction score
- 4,891
I'm only on the impact section.The last one is Dr. Tsuji, who will bring back all of our hair one day !
How did you not recognize him from half the avatars on this forum? lol.
I don't believe in 'the cure' any time soon
- Reaction score
- 11,938
Hair multiplication is coming out in approximately 5 years, supposedly.
It might be absurdly expensive though.
- Reaction score
- 5,624
Crap i thought tsuji was the Asian guy from the hangover LOL
- Reaction score
- 4,891
I've been following hair loss related articles for over a decade and the cure always looks like its three years away and then trials happen and theres no success.
The only thing that has improved is hair transplants - the FUE's that we see today are so much better than they were 10 or so years ago.
I agree with this. I have been following the hair loss news since 2008 and hair multiplication is always within next 5 years. In fact, I even remember reading back in 2004 that hair cloning was on the horizon. I recognize that just because something failed in the past, it doesn't mean it will also fail in the future. I also recognize the scientific advancements that have been made in the field. But repeated failure and dashed hopes every few year does make you pretty indifferent to claims about cure being available within next 5 years. I will believe it when I see it. Despite all the advancements, we don't even know why finasteride reacts adversely to some individuals and exacerbates balding or cause impotence instead of helping hair. All hair loss drugs have been accidental discoveries. What a pathetic field.