bubka said:
here is why your theory is bad:
you eluted to the fact of human evolution, and how our diet had changed, thus causing male pattern baldness
well buddy, i have bad news, many species of apes, of which we have a common ancestry, have GOSH.... male pattern baldness:
When the body is starved it releases a rush of androgens which caused DHT to elevate. All it takes is for an ape to go, for example, a few weeks without food for him to start to suffer from miniaturization if they really are the same as humans.
I'm still not convinced we should be using Apes as a model for human male pattern baldness.
bubka said:
all without the modern American diet, all without not cooking fats, living with Eskimos or Native Americans :wink: :roll:
Yes, I'm well aware that apes cannot cook.
docj077 said:
DNA and ribosomal RNA sequencing disagrees. In fact, I have an evolutionary wheel so complete and based on sequencing that it can retrace the evolution of all species back to single celled organisms.
They say we evolved from Dolphins too. Are you going to use them as a model for studying male pattern baldness?
Bryan said:
Yes, but SO WHAT?? You're trying to dodge the important point, which is that those other primates suffer the same kind of androgenetic alopecia that we humans do. They have been excellent animal models for testing in this area and respond the same way we do to the various hairloss treatments, including topical minoxidil, oral finasteride, RU58841, etc. They develop that balding while living in their natural environments, eating their natural diets, and I've heard rumors that they don't even cook their fats!

How do you explain THAT little conundrum? :wink:
Bryan
AS I've said above If you starve your body it will upset the hormonal balance and release a wave of DHT which can cause miniaturization. In theory, all the apes would have had to is gone without food for the requisite period.
Conundrum solved.
SkylineGTR said:
man when i see a monkey start to cook his food then i'll start running for the hills cuz its gunna be a planet of the apes.
This is highly unlikely occurrence.
bubka said:
yes you are an ape you dumb ***, same freaking genes too buddy, same reason for male pattern baldness
I am not an ape. I'm not so sure about you. If apes DO suffer male pattern baldness then yes you're right. HORMONAL IMBALANCE for a period of time causes male pattern baldness
bubka said:
in some species of apes, males are actually selected by females because of their male pattern baldness
Is that what she told you?
bubka said:
DammitLetMeIn: i think your theory does have some merit still, because in planet of the apes, they did cook, and harvest corn, which is not a natural diet, which is why some apes in the movie had male pattern baldness
You do realize that is fictional right? (or maybe I should just let you believe it)
SkylineGTR said:
Your talking about isolated communities.... which i bet had no genetic predisposition for it. I highly doubt that was because of diet but rather stress and environment.... i mean thats like saying they are tan because of what they eat.
'Price also demolished any notion that these isolated groups of unusually healthy people somehow had a unique hereditary resistance to disease and degeneration. He reasoned that had superior genes been the case, then following up people who abandoned life in a healthful community for the life of "civilization" should find them continuing in the same good condition. If genetically determined, then not only the adults who left should continue to be healthy, but when a married pair left, their children, carrrying the exact same genetics, should also be foundto be in good fettle. This proved not to be the case.'
SkylineGTR said:
And there were many pre war jap instances of balding. Why do you think most of them had the type of haircuts they did. If they were balding they would shave it all off. I have Japanese ancestry and did ask my grandma about this(100% Japanese from japan and pre war with an integrated western diet later in life). Very preposterous. There has always been receding hairlines and widows peaks... and if they saw evidence of baldness they would shave it all off most of the time..
The Japanese thing I am going on a popular notion. I don't think there's any dispute over the fact that 2nd generation Japanese people living in the US experience more balding than older generations. Diet is the only explanation.
I'm not sure where you're Gran is from but apparently rural Japanese had even less balding than urban japanese. The reasons? well....diet
SkylineGTR said:
Sure diet plays a part if you already live an unhealthy lifestyle as it would cause the extra stress and obesity and diabetes etc.... But as im sure most of us are fairly healthy here so it doesnt hold much merit..
Healthy by whose standards? Who is really fulfilling their potential healthwise? who gets all the nutrients required daily (and im not talking RDAs), who only eats only natural whole foods? (mostly raw), who doesn't eat cooked fats?
SkylineGTR said:
As I've already indicated with scientific sources in this thread, food turns on and off genetic switches.
JayMan said:
But I still have male pattern baldness.
I wonder why.
The wrong macronutrient ratio for your body.
michael barry said:
The post-war Japanese are indeed balding more than they used to.
Perhaps this is due to less green tea, soya, fish, veggies, and rice (lotsa beta sis in rice) and more high glycemic index foods and processed foods in their diets?
I agree, eating those foods would leave one more hormonally balanced than eating a modern day western diet hyped full of sugar and altered fats.
bubka said:
do you have stats for that, or just pulling it out of DammitLetMeIn's ***?
I really wish you'd leave my '***' outta this
docj077 said:
That's what I'm thinking, as well..
O RLY! I thought you didn't think diet was a major factor?
docj077 said:
The problem with the westernization of the Japanese diet is not strictly related to addition of fatty foods
The heaps and heaps of sugar in the Western diet and consequent high insulin levels may also have something to do with it :roll:
docj077 said:
but that the Japanese have begun removing foods that are potentially rich in phytoestrogens and other substances that may potentially be stimulants of hair growth or foods that may inhibit hair loss all together.
yes phytoestrogens will no doubt have an impact upon DHT, even japanese prostates are smaller as a consequence and this will have an impact upon their male pattern baldness rates. HOwever, I don't think it does so on its own, its the overall balance in the foods they had which is their key imo.
michael barry said:
There used to be a webmd article that brought up the subject, but I couldn't find it..
Interesting you found a source for the Japanese thing. Bubka will never believe you though.
michael barry said:
Anyway............I work for a Japanese company, and many of the younger Japanese execs have some recession, but alot of the old guys have all their hair, even in their sixties and seventies. Wonder why that is? .
Which is more evidence to suggest that diet trumps genetics where male pattern baldness is concerned.
michael barry said:
I personally think soya and green tea and rice and fish and veggies are good for hair from an androgenic standpoint, and McDonalds and Cooca-cola, no matter how wonderful they taste, are not.
I agree, its definitely a combination and not just because of soya and green tea
bubka said:
thanks, i am sure you effort it well spent and intended, but i think i understand male pattern baldness pretty well here...
He stated he had a medical article. But safe to say to you didn't bother to read any of his links.
bubka said:
i don't care about your anecdotal evidence, this guy claims that Eskimos, Native Americans, and Japanese experienced no male pattern baldness
And I'll give you evidence. But, I still think you'd make another excuse. You just love big macs I think...
Old Baldy said:
DLM: You've relegated Western medicine to Dark Ages types of practices. .
On the contrary. I feel Western medicine has much we can be proud of. But I feel the route it has taken is very specific and narrow and one that relies upon instant results whereas some changes in the body require much longer.
Old Baldy said:
Now where do place the basic premise of the primates balding fact in your hypothesis? (Please just don't say they are apes and have no similarities.).
See my answer above
Old Baldy said:
Also, all my life I've never heard a doctor say fruits, veggies, lean meats and whole grains are things we should stay away from.
You didn't hear me say it either. Low glycemic raw fruits, vegetables, and whole grains are great for your health. cooked lean meats....eehh
Old Baldy said:
"Western" doctors, in the main, have ALWAYS felt diet was an important component to preventing disease. (Well, at least during my lifetime - which started in about 1807!) To think otherwise is incorrect IMHO.
You heard DocJ's view on the outlook of WEstern Medicine earlier. HE stated disease came from genetics and that diet had little influence
Old Baldy said:
My habits of juicing, growing fruits and veggies, eating lean meats, nuts, beans and whole grains came from DOCTORS' advice!.
Its sad you'll only listen to a medical doctor as to what to eat. Try listening to a qualified clinical nutritionist or someone of that ilk. They'll likely be much more knowledgable.
Old Baldy said:
One of the most conservative doctors, Dr. Stephen Bennett of Quackwatch.com, sent me an email stating he thought juicing was a good addition to an otherwise healthy diet! He didn't think it would replace good whole foods but it could help.!.
You needed to speak to Quackwatch to decipher if juicing was good for you? sure the answer was obvious?
Old Baldy said:
So don't say Western doctors feel diet is unimportant.
Western doctors treat with drugs, diet is very much a secondary thing
Old Baldy said:
Tidbit: There was one jackass doctor, back in about 1950, who was the head of the FDA and stated diet has no effect on disease. He was not highly thought of by the medical profession to say the least.
Is it so surprising that he was the head of the FDA with that attitude? I dosn't surprise me one bit
Old Baldy said:
You guys are correct IMHO. Diet helps, to be fair, but it ain't the cure IMHO.
Its the cause and the cure.
JayMan said:
I am interested to hear of these foods that may inhibit hair loss all together? Wouldn't this replace the need to take drugs if this was true?
Haven't you heard of Equol produced by Soy?? It handcuffs DHT and stops it from damaging the follicle.
docj077 said:
I exaggerated a little too much on that one. .
You didn't really, certain foods have actually been shown to do this
docj077 said:
Sorry, JayMan. In Japan, a diet rich in phytoestrogens doesn't seem to affect the population all that much..
Source?
docj077 said:
As for a diet combination that can inhibit large amount of DHT production, there was a study posted on this site not too long ago that clearly demonstrated that taking in soy products along with green tea inhibited massive amounts of DHT production.
I think it more 'handcuffs' DHT from what I read
docj077 said:
Unfortunately, either one alone doesn't seem to work well and green tea alone may even raise hormone levels. .
Green tea may raise hormones but it also raises SGBH
docj077 said:
I think a diet filled with fermented soy products and the daily intake of green tea could potentially do wonders for the hair and for keeping androgens down. I'm hoping that some better studies come out to help us out. .
How about pre-empting future studies and rely on past science and actually eating the stuff?
docj077 said:
Some say phytoestrogens prevent prostate cancer, some say they may cause breast cancer, and some say they prevent endometrial cancer. Estrogens in general are linked to prostate cancer, but I don't think anyone has really worked that problem out, yet.
I think too MUCH of anything is bad for you.
JayMan said:
I am wondering if there are any foods or drugs that you know of that can reduce regular T production?
DamN!!! I provided a link which stated JUST THAT!!
Old Baldy said:
Hmmm.... kind of a blow to the diet theory isn't it? The Japanese men produced MORE steroids and increased 5AR activity than New Zealand men who consume LESS soy.
Good post old baldy, but it also states Equol levels were several times higher. Equol is shown to handcuff DHT!