People who demand facts and evidence think they're so clever. Science schmience. Anyway, nice talking to you, I have to go take some hydroxychloroquine to prevent the coronavirus.
Did you know the solidarity trial which found hydroxychloroquine to be ineffective also showed remdesivir to be ineffective?
The Solidarity Trial published interim results on 15 October 2020. It found that all 4 treatments evaluated (remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon) had little or no effect on overall mortality, initiation of ventilation and duration of hospital stay in hospitalized patients.
Funny the people who say follow the science never look at the science, they just believe what they hear in the media. All the studies showing HCQ to be inneffective were looking at monotherapy, and the ones showing it to be dangerous were looking at chloroquine not hydroxychloroquine. HCQ is effective and safe when taken with azithromycin
, but Gilead doesn't want you to know.
Everything is in the discord, nobody is telling you that you have to buy SMI first. Nobody here is making any money off of it unlike the media which got over 100 million from Gilead last year while HCQ is off patent. No one can promise you that SMI can give you good results. What we can say is that the drug has been shown to be effective at blocking the PRLR and so far we have noticed some positive results with no negative side effects, but a higher dosage is probably required for full receptor inactivation, hence the larger group buy so that people can afford to take a larger dose.