More dosing doesn’t mean better results, lol!
Drink 10 diazepam instead 1 and you will die.
Yea, that's the case with some medicines.
But sometimes more is better. Although too much of anything can kill you.
More dosing doesn’t mean better results, lol!
Drink 10 diazepam instead 1 and you will die.
In most cases is like that. More doesn’t mean better. Put more skin cream on your face and your face will react and will be red (in most cases)Yea, that's the case with some medicines.
But sometimes more is better. Although too much of anything can kill you.
In most cases is like that. More doesn’t mean better. Put more skin cream on your face and your face will react and will be red (in most cases)
What all should be happy is that Replicel is perfectly safe. I don’t want to put something in my head which produce cancer or other serious side effects.
Even Shiseido will not spend millions of dollars, because Replicel is only safe.Firstly, everything is like that. Too much of ANYTHING will hurt you.
Secondly, I would not spend 1 penny on Replicel simply because it's safe. If they want my money then it needs to be safe AND EFFECTIVE.
Even Shiseido will not spend millions of dollars, because Replicel is only safe.
While your post is true about the $4mil payout, it's a little misleading. There are more incentives in their agreement.That is the ONE POINT that seems positive about Replicel. Why would Shiseido put any money into Replicel if they didn't know something that might make Shiseido an effective treatment? I don't know the answer to that question but prior to Samumed releasing its' results some of us thought that based on how Samumed was behaving they must have a breakthrough treatment but then it turned out that (at least so far) their study results were unimpressive. And from that I learnt that drug companies do not always behave sensibly.
I hope Shiseido proves to be a game-changer. I do agree that it is odd that they're spending millions of dollars on a treatment that produced mediocre results in its' phase 1 study.
But keep this in mind: One poster said that Shiseido paid only $4 million for Replicel's treatment, and more importantly $4 million is only a pittance to pay for a game-changing hair loss cure. If I invented a game-changing cure for hair loss I could get a lot more than $4 million for it. It is a small amount of money for Shiseido to pay and it's a small amount of money for Replicel to receive, if it's a game-changing treatment.
While your post is true and the $4mil payout, it's a little misleading. There are more incentives in their agreement.
If I may put my two cents in, I remember that in this japanese article from w june they compared this method to current treatments and emphasised that it will be used once and daily applications will be redundant. And more important for thinning hair. To my mind it probably means that they will made living follicles dht resistant.( if you are nw3 or less it is even better than Tsuji.)
I'm with you, I believe this has the possibility to be really good for guys who are nw3 or less. You could get this treatment then get your temples filled in with an FUE and potentially be done with this disease. But that is wishful thinking on my part.
I'm only thinning so I am a little biased when it comes to this method because it has the potential to be huge for me.
One thing I've heard from Replicel that I don't get is they said the treatment by Shiseido would probably be based around a single injection. I've heard this in the hellouser interview with Buckler and Hoffman.
Do they mean a single round of multiple (hundreds) of injections, or really just one single injection? You would think that to target the entire 600cm2 hair growing area of scalp, they would need to perform hundreds of separate injections using their injector device.
One thing I've heard from Replicel that I don't get is they said the treatment by Shiseido would probably be based around a single injection. I've heard this in the hellouser interview with Buckler and Hoffman.
Do they mean a single round of multiple (hundreds) of injections, or really just one single injection? You would think that to target the entire 600cm2 hair growing area of scalp, they would need to perform hundreds of separate injections using their injector device.
While your post is true about the $4mil payout, it's a little misleading. There are more incentives in their agreement.
If I may put my two cents in, I remember that in this japanese article from w june they compared this method to current treatments and emphasised that it will be used once and daily applications will be redundant. And more important for thinning hair. To my mind it probably means that they will made living follicles dht resistant.( if you are nw3 or less it is even better than Tsuji.)
If the folicles arent dead they should grow back.How do you think this will work for diffuse thinners?
If the folicles arent dead they should grow back.
Thats only speculations.You're basically saying that Replicel is going to be a complete cure for hair loss in patient's NW4 and under since people who are NW4 and under still have all of their working follicles but they have shrunk.
It's crazy talk to say that Replicel sold partial rights of a total cure (for NW4 and under) to Shiseido for $4 million. If Replicel had a total cure for NW4 and under then other drug companies (besides Shiseido) would have been making offers also and the payment to Replicel would have climbed much higher than $4 million.
