- Reaction score
- 207
so no hope for slick bald nw7?lol That remains to be seen. If your entire hairline doesn't come back then just get a small hair transplant.
so no hope for slick bald nw7?lol That remains to be seen. If your entire hairline doesn't come back then just get a small hair transplant.
Sure, but maybe not for the hairline on a slick bald nw7. Frontotemporal hairs are a different beastso no hope for slick bald nw7?
The price of each injection may be much higher than a transplant right?Can't be done. It's a monoclonal antibody. We received a quote of 2 million dollars for 10 grams
No, I doubt it will be more than 2k per injection once it's commercialized. Probably a good bit less.The price of each injection may be much higher than a transplant right?
Indeed in this case it is more than interesting. Hope you are right and this product will hit the market !No, I doubt it will be more than 2k per injection once it's commercialized. Probably a good bit less.
Ppl pay 1k$ for prp treatment, that they make from your own blood and which is the biggest snake oil of this industry so imagin how much they would pay for this.As we're on the subject. LOL @ anyone who thinks they are developing a drug for Androgenetic Alopecia that costs this much and isn't superior to minoxidil and dutasteride which cost pennies. Nobody would pay antibody prices if it wasn't effectively a cure.
They will pay 10-20k for 6 months treatment.Ppl pay 1k$ for prp treatment, that they make from your own blood and which is the biggest snake oil of this industry so imagin how much they would pay for this.
how often do you think injections would be needed, biannually?No, I doubt it will be more than 2k per injection once it's commercialized. Probably a good bit less.
but if prp had to go through fda which HMI will have to it would get denied because its f*****g ineffective. the reason why you can scam so much with autologous stem cell therqpeutics is bc they dont need to get approved by any agency bc its just your own unprocessed cellsPpl pay 1k$ for prp treatment, that they make from your own blood and which is the biggest snake oil of this industry so imagin how much they would pay for this.
So on the macaques it was a 6 month course, injections every two weeks and those results lasted at least 2 years and had barely started to drop back after 4. I imagine the standard would be something like a 6 months every two years?how often do you think injections would be needed, biannually?
It's not one injection it was 12If it works, every man will want this. Expect prices to drop fast, the demand for this will be sky high if it really is as promised (1 injection every 2 years, no side effects)
It's only an estimation, if i wanted to be pessimistic i'd say some postponing is bound to happen.is hmi supposed to be out in 2024? i need to cope badly rn
Macaques managed to keep their hair for 4 years, they seemed to have lost very little, but then again it's on macaques.10-20k every 2 years is still pretty steep tbh
honestly to me the most likely outcome is that this produces results comparable to what replicel accomplished, some small effect and then they will say yes yes statistically significant and we may develop it further and then you wont hear from it ever again. just the fsct that prolactin is not involved in any of the major pwthways knows to cause regression of hair is a red flag already. although if it sas that obvious surely they would not have bought the rights bc they are biotechnologists and probably know what they are doingIt's only an estimation, if i wanted to be pessimistic i'd say some postponing is bound to happen.
And i'll assume you're French, but sorry frérot but if it comes out as some sort of mesotherapy, it'll be a pain to find here, just look at the horrendous state and the lag of modern hair restoration clinics and dermatologists.
SMI-6 hitting the grey market could be a good alternative in the mean time, we should try to push this for big sellers.
Macaques managed to keep their hair for 4 years, they seemed to have lost very little, but then again it's on macaques.
It's possible that humans don't keep them half as long.
And sh*t, if you can buy 2 years drug free, if you're willing to add something to that, you might last long enough for better treatment to eventually come out.
I wouldn't be so sure, prolactin is known to cause hair loss in women by precipitating the follicles in the telogen phase.honestly to me the most likely outcome is that this produces results comparable to what replicel accomplished, some small effect and then they will say yes yes statistically significant and we may develop it further and then you wont hear from it ever again. just the fsct that prolactin is not involved in any of the major pwthways knows to cause regression of hair is a red flag already. although if it sas that obvious surely they would not have bought the rights bc they are biotechnologists and probably know what they are doing