What am I doing here?
Actually taking time to read about and share information about new research that could better treat or cure hairloss. I tend to side with the positive outlook because the outlook is positive.
In less than a year of being here I've:
• Created the most comprehensive fact thread about FIDIA's lotion on the web.
• Brought news of RepliCel's (then) impending data and other news to the forums; the first to do so anywhere outside of business news articles and within minutes of it being posted. This lead to the most in-depth discussion of the company and its tech that I have personally seen, spanning dozens of pages. Pages where you mostly complained about it because it probably won't be of much help to you since you're significantly bald.
• Answered many, many questions on the forums and especially via PM of people thinking about trying Minoxidil or Finasteride or experiencing side effects of the latter without all the scare mongering.
among other things.
You?
• Complain in impact that girls don't love you because you're bald.
• Argue scientifically incorrect information at almost every turn and contradict yourself. You, along with another user, insisted that hairloss is "aging" and as such, a reversal of that process (which you actually believe could be here in five years) would thus reverse hairloss despite all elementary-level science that can be found in two-second Google search disproving your entire theory. Still believe that aging cure will be here in five years?
• Make a million threads that amount to essentially baseless, hopeful speculation or attack threads on other users. Remember your thread from a few months back about how you were spinning the Tsuji timeline to mean that it would be out next year (2018)? I remember.
• Rant and rave about epithelial cells like there is no possible solution, yet you triumphantly claimed that Alexey Terskikh had solved the problem by using IPSCs to bypass the problem entirely.
It's obvious to most here that you are mentally suffering the ultimate mid-life crisis. You feel you've been robbed because of hairloss, we get it, and you're having extreme difficulty coming to terms with that fact that although we are realistically faced with the possibility of treatments that will will be superior to contemporary ones and could even outright cure hairloss, it won't give you the years you missed out on back.
It's causing you to spout crazy bullshit at alarming frequency
What a bunch of horseshit. What an exaggeration of your own worth.
* You post misleading and outright false positive bs.
* You may have posted something about FIDIA but I don't care about it, whatever it is. I only want to know (1) when a cure happens and (2) when they find a solution to the inductivity problem. Those are the only 2 things that matter to me.
* You brag about posting Replicel info when Replicel got something like 4% regrowth. Whoop Dee Doo! That makes it half as good as finasteride + minoxidil, two treatments that are already available. And nobody needed your help to find out about Replicel. We were going to find out about Replicel whether you were here or not.
* You answered some questions - so what? Practically everyone here has answered questions. You have a low bar for self-congratulation and self-aggrandizement.
* I don't complain about women not liking bald guys anymore than anyone else. Sometimes I actually post that it's reasonable for women to dislike bald guys. The only thing I get consistently annoyed with women about is when they try to lie about disliking bald guys. That annoys me because I don't like the lying part of the equation. On the issue of women not being attracted to bald men - I think it's reasonable for them not to be into bald guys. After all, what is attractive about baldness?
* I still insist that aging plays a role in hair loss. And just because you and some other bro-science types say I'm wrong doesn't make me wrong. Only a fool would respect the opinion of the bro-scientists here. I don't respect 90 something percent of what the bro-scientists here (yourself included) say.
* In fact, top research scientists are saying that a cure for the aging process will be here within 4 years. You dispute what they say but I agree with them. I respect those top scientists more than any of the horseshit that comes from your bro-science mouth.
* Yea I have posted opposing concepts. My opinions change as I get new evidence or as I re-think existing evidence. Most mature intelligent people change their opinions when they get new evidence or rethink older evidence and of course you want to make a big deal of that as if it means something important. And of course you don't understand a person changing his position about an issue because you're in permanent auto-pilot positive bs mode. I'm not. I'm willing to rethink things and adjust to new information. You're just a broken record singing "everything is rosy".
* Yea Alexey Terskikh has solved the inductivity problem with iPS cells BUT Tsuji has said not said he's willing to use the iSP cells to solve the inductivity problem to treat hair loss. If he's unwilling to use iPS cells to treat hair loss then it's irrelevant that it would probably work.
* I will gladly accept that cures are coming as soon as Tsuji says that he will definitely use iPS cells to treat hair loss or that he has found another way to solve the inductivity problem. I think I'm being very reasonable here. You and your band of MERRYmen want to sweep the inductivity problem under the carpet. But I do not. I think it's a real problem that has to be solved.
* Your speculative horseshit about me being negative because I'm angry that I've lost years to hair loss is stupid. The moment that Tsuji announces that he is ready to use iPS cells for hair loss, or that he's found some other solution to the inductivity problem, I'll start popping champagne corks. The time I've lost is lost and unless they cure the aging process there's nothing I can do about that lost time. I understand that. I just want to stop losing more time asap. I'm going to try to get this through your thick skull one more time - I'm being negative because there really is a HUGE roadblock in the way of Tsuji curing hair loss - loss of hair inductivity during cell culture.
* What is your intellectual deficit that you can't grasp that I'm raising a genuine issue? What is wrong with you? I think you must be insane not to have noticed that we have 3 cell based groups (Aderans, Replicel, Intercytex) that have all failed because of this same inductivity problem and you also don't get it that even Team Tsuji is saying that this is a BIG problem and they haven't solved it yet.
* iPS cell technology was well known before Team Tsuji gave us their recent interview so if they were OK with using iPS cells to get around the inducivity problem why didn't they say that in their recent interview? If they were willing to use iPS cell tech why did they say they still have to solve the inductivity problem? Why didn't they instead say "We're going to use iPS cell tech to solve the inductivity problem so there are no big tech problems left to solve."?
* I admit that you occasionally come up with some good comments but when push comes to shove you're just another positive bs peddler who sweeps the negative stuff under the carpet.
Last edited: