I see a lot of people participating in these group buys and after digging a bit into the science of it especially the paper published on the stump tailed monkeys that are a good animal model for androgenic alopecia i can understand the temptation at least some of it. however, prolactin and its effect on hair has been studied before has it not? there are no major publications that remotely indicate that it could have such potential. for every compaound ever trialed, i can understand the pathway and how exactly it might be involved in the pathology of AA. however, with this antibody, i get it the monkey have AA too but still... what is the theory behind this? how does it fit into the conventinally believed model of AA? I am sure someone has thrown in some idea in those 33 pages of thread but i can not read through that. I read quite some papers and some have found a suppression of anagen phase but only when prolactin in very high levels was used. which means that for a normal ranged guy, suppressing any signaling even further, how much is that going to profit them? no research on that at all.
I really hope, hopemed is going to trial this drug for AA. so far, they have only announced a trial for the other condition and i am afraid, it could go down like it did with companies of the likes of beloved cassiopea who took a literal decade to achieve a literal pile of nothing and they decided acne was their place to be and so totally neglected AA. I have a feeling this could be very similar with hopemed. what are the similarities? the vagina disease hopemed is trying to cure would also be covered by insurance, very convenient when you have an anti body that would probably cost thosuands of dollars in a prescription. for cassipea, this horse was acne. but we will see, hopefully very soon too