Ehh... it's actually a BAD thing to abandon the placebo group.viperfish said:Chicano said:I personally think Eucapil is a "hype" product. Have you all seen the "official" results: (check it out in page 5)
http://www.menspharma.com/fluridil_adobe.pdf
Not really a big deal...with those results I prefer the "placebo" over Eucapil...
Yeah, you got it wrong man! Go back and read the study slowly. The placebo saw no results during the initial 3 months. After those 3 months the placebo group was then given fluridil because of the great results that were seen with those using the fluridil, during the initial 3 months. The placebo, once given fluridil, then began to see great results. It is not a "hype" product and has been shown to work through a 12 month double-blind-placebo controlled test. You can't get any better than that! :wink:
Actually i have read one independent study done with fluridil. I dont remember which site posted it though...Beethoven said:a lot of people suspect this product because there is no independent experiment with it - only the manufacturer test.
docj077 said:I hope nobody here is taking Fluridil or Spironolactone internally. That's a poor decision.
Honestly, spironolactone should be an experimental treatment as it wasn't designed to be an anti-androgen. It's a potassium sparing diuretic. Fluridil, on the other hand, was apparently designed to be an anti-androgen.