Blondeguy,
You let me down. You are dishonest in debate, and I now see it. Im going to paste your whole post and respond. By the way, Im wondering if you are Mahair, but I may be wrong.
You posted:
michael barry wrote:
How many of us would be interested in a woman who was going bald, front to back? Yup, very very few.
How silly. First, women with shaved heads are hot. Second, balding is a masculine trait so of course most people wouldn't be attracted to it on a woman. Men look for reproductive indicators, while women look for survival indicators. Full hair on a woman is a reproductive indicator of health, but not on a man. Confident men are attractive, because confidence is a result of success which means that guy is more likely to have the capability of ensuring her survival. Baldness has nothing to do with any of that. A lot of you use baldness as a justification to feel miserable and lonely, but you don't need to feel that way.
LEMME SEE< YOU CLAIMED WOMEN WITH SHAVED HEADS ARE HOT. MOST WOULD DISAGREE WITH THAT. NATALIE PORTMAN LOOKED GOOD WITH A SHAVED HEAD, BUT BETTER WITH HAIR. A HEAD SHAVED OUT OF CHOICE AND NOT MALE PATTERN BALDNESS LOOKS BETTER.
Quote:
Baldness, like acne, psoriasis, big pores, thin hair, scrawny bodies, propensity to obesity, bad teeth, stuck-out ears, small genitalia, body odor, is NOT A FAVORABLE TRAIT.
Baldness has nothing to do with any of those things you listed. You're just lumping it in with a bunch of negatives. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------BALDNESS IS IN A LONG LINE OF UNFAVORABLE TRAITS MUCH LIKE THE ONES LISTED. HOWEVER, I ADMIT READILY SOME MEN CAN BE BALD AND COOL AND BALD AND HANDSOME, UNLIKE MEN WITH ACNE OR STUCK OUT EARS. ITS (BALDNESS) NOT A "BIRTH DEFECT", BUT AS PRETTY LARGE COLORFUL EYES LOOK BETTER THAN HAZY, POORLY COLORED, SMALL ONES, A FULL HEAD OF BEAUTIFUL HAIR LOOKS BETTER THAN WISPY THIN HAIR AND WE BOTH KNOW IT
Quote:
You can indeed compensate by being trim and fit and having a nice face, and using skin care prodcuts so you have good skin, and you can dress tastefully, be economically successful and have a nice car.........................................but it still is not a "favored" trait.
Yes, it is. All men thin to some degree during adulthood as a sign of biological maturity. It happens with primates. =========================================================NO, NOT ALL MEN. SOME MEN KEEP ALL THEIR HAIR ALL THEIR LIVES. I HAVE A GREAT UNCLE WHO IS SEVENTY SOMETHING WITH A FULL HEAD OF BLACK HAIR.
Quote:
There are some women out there who absolutely wont date a balding man.
And there are some men who absolutely won't date redheads. So what? .............-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------THAT WAS TO LET YOU KNOW SOME WOMEN DONT LIKE MALE BALDNESS. CAN YOU THINK OF ANY WOMAN WHO REFUSES TO DATE MEN WHO HAVE HAIR? ME EIHER
Quote:
Ive seen some ads in the personals from really hot chicks that explicity said they did NOT want a man with any kind of male pattern baldness and wanted a man with a full head of hair. They actually stated that. So some women view it as a dealbreaker, alot of others dont.
And I've seen really hot chicks walking arm in arm with a bald man. So what? =============================================================================================================MY POINT AGAIN, IT GOES TO SHOW THAT BALDNESS CAN BE SEEN AS AN UNFAVORABLE TRAIT BY SOME. SOME WOMEN PREFER MEN WITH ALL THEIR HAIR, ESPECIALLY IF HIS HEAD SHAPE IS NOT SYMETRICAL
Quote:
Its as if you met a chick with a face you liked, but she was prone to obesity or had bad teeth that were yellow and unstraight. Those teeth might piss you off so much, you elect to go out with a chick with a lesser face and bod, but perfect teeth.
Again, baldness has nothing to do with that. It's a totally natural male process. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IM GIVING AN EXAMPLE OF AN UNFAVORABLE TRAIT OVER-RULING OTHER UNFAVORABLE TRAITS IN SOME WOMEN'S ESTIMATION. YOU WERE EVADING THE ISSUE
JayMan wrote:
lol @dna and unstoppable
100% unstoppable. You will lose hair regardless of treatments.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................THIS IS WHERE WE STRONGLY DISAGREE. ARE YOU AWARE THAT A SIXTY THREE YEAR OLD MAN WHO HAD BEEN BALD SINCE TWENTY EIGHT, WAS ON SPIRONOLACTONE FOR SIX YEARS FOR CIRROHSIS, AND STARTED REGROWING HAIR ALL OVER HIS HEAD?
Receptor blockers, and topicals that inhibit receptor expression like what Andro-science is working on will probably end further baldness from a treatment end. They simply either block the androgen receptors in the scalp, or inhibit them from forming with daily usage. Ive seen pictures of people who used a receptor blocker on mustache hair (fluridil) and made the mustache completely disappear over a few months. HM is being worked on also, and is expected to be out in within a decade at the very most, but probably a few years less than that.
You are wrong to think that science will not conquer baldness , because it will. Treatments can keep you "in hair" until the above methods become available or effective.
Im glad your happy with your shave. There is NOTHING wrong with being bald or shaving it. However, there is nothing wrong with using topical spironolactone, revivogen, or fluridil, or prox-n, or tricomin either. None of those have side effects, and all should help one hold onto their hair for several years until better things (or CURES) are available. These men are not freaks for putting a topical on their head or shampooing with nizoral. Finasteride has a biological precedent in Guatamalean men who dont even have the alpha five reductase type two enzyme, and they live healthy long lives, so it wont turn you into a green monster either.
I think you are awfully obsessed with what a few men decide to do with their own hair, and want to guilt monger them for it. They have simply made a different choice than you have. They may join you in shaving in a few years, or not. Getting a tatoo is a hell of alot more invasive than spraying crinagen or something on one's scalp.
