You clearly missed the point of the post, because the point was to neutralize belief in Beps' claims. You can remove beps from it and it still means the same thing: Restoring norwoods of pure vellus hairs into equivalent in number terminal hairs is an impossible feat for a topical. Restoring some slight fringe like the top of Woody Harrelson's head is a more realistic reality.
You still have the strenght to discuss these over-dabated things... I think in these pages I said all I know and expressed all my thoughts, like everybody did. I don't think there's anything left to say.
However, I'll try to state another time a point: if Beps is really Giuseppe Brotzu (and we know that at 99% he is), months ago he still had his profile Facebook unlocked, so an user of this forum checked his profile and the photo in which he was tagged and reported them to me: really, 4-5 years ago he was slick bald, now in a photo of 2 years ago, he was showing a decent regrowth (even in frontal area!), and you know I'm reliable when evaluating a Norwood Scale. He went to 5A to something minor. Didn't seem a 3 at that moment, but in this 2 years he should have improved.
Plus, I remember to you that the coverage and regrowth was NOT evaluated only with the sole eyes, but Brotzu himself in the patent, in the BC's interview, and at Turin's Sitri, said he used a dermoscopia all the time with the help of an equipe of dermatologists at Policlinico. At SITRI's he even admitted "at first I didn't know what we were doing, I didn't know what a dermoscope was because it's not part of my everyday tools". Then, in the patent, he specifically says that the first trials on Androgenetic Alopecia and AA (the mixed ones) all the results were evaluated using a dermoscope while the lotion was applied in a specific area of the scalp.
And, most important, even Marlin, admin of IESON, clearly stated repeatedly that Beps is not a troll and he showed privately to him that he was not lying. Yeah, he is still skeptical about the lotion, but he guarantees Beps is not a fake.
I don't think there's much more to discuss, if we keep to walk in circles, we only raise doubts which were solved 100+ pages ago.