A lot of cancers have been cured. Hep C has been cured. HIV is virtually cured. Having researchers curing diseases doesn't have to be at the expense of hair loss. It's not a competition. Biggest problem is humanity is wasting our resources and money in death/war/military. Curing disease should be our objective, including this hair loss.
A lot of cancers have been cured. Hep C has been cured. HIV is virtually cured. Having researchers curing diseases doesn't have to be at the expense of hair loss. It's not a competition. Biggest problem is humanity is wasting our resources and money in death/war/military. Curing disease should be our objective, including this hair loss.
Where are the posters you're referencing? It seems a lot of people (here and on BTT) are just overlooking it or more focused on other treatments, though some are doubtful. I think it's a good sign that Samumed announced that it increased hair count and density within 2 weeks of phase II finishing since they easily could have waited, and that means the efficacy was at least somewhat clear. I will be more excited if they announce a phase III and/or when more in-depth phase II results are released.
Are you saying hair loss is a disease, and have to be cured?
A lot of cancers have been cured. Hep C has been cured. HIV is virtually cured. Having researchers curing diseases doesn't have to be at the expense of hair loss. It's not a competition. Biggest problem is humanity is wasting our resources and money in death/war/military. Curing disease should be our objective, including this hair loss.
A lot of cancers have been cured. Hep C has been cured. HIV is virtually cured. Having researchers curing diseases doesn't have to be at the expense of hair loss. It's not a competition. Biggest problem is humanity is wasting our resources and money in death/war/military. Curing disease should be our objective, including this hair loss.
Hellouser, Swisstemples states you're friends, do you know if he is still going to update his website? it's been a month now :-/
That's great but cancer is still the no. 2 cause of death in the United States where a war on cancer was declared by Richard Nixon four decades ago. And it's number two worldwide.
And the overall death rate from war is down. But I think it might be due them switching from land invasions to aerial bombing. That way allows them to continue murdering people but without the home team suffering as many casualties.
No idea, I did ask him if he's going to give an update... his answer was more of a 'yes' but I don't really remember, I've had a lot on my plate lately.
.
Curing cancer is irrelevant. Finding the cure for baldness doesn't come at the cost of a solution for cancer. It's pretty offensive when people say there are bigger problems than hair loss.
I think part of the reason for scientific interest in hair follicles is because of the fast growth nature of keratinocytes. The only other cell types in human bodies which divide as rapidly are cancer cells. Elaine Fuchs has done a lot of research in this area. Hair follicles and cancer are two very interesting areas of study for researchers.
No idea, I did ask him if he's going to give an update... his answer was more of a 'yes' but I don't really remember, I've had a lot on my plate lately.
I agree - I would be interested in hearing what you are the most excited for and why. Cheers.maybe hellouser should give us summary and his personal opinion about situation...
thx and well done hellouser