Besides al the vague sides effects of Finasteride, there is one side effect that is scientifically proven in relation with finasteride, and i know for 99% sure that every Finasteride user has to deal with this side effect. It affects your fertility. Yes, the intern & extern validity of the studies could be better, but you really have to be 'blind' if you don't want to endorse this effect. The sperm quality will be better if the patient stops with finasteride, however it is still not known if this effect always will be reversible. See below for the finasterde studies.
Now i'm really wondering why s-equol should be better than finasteride. Why you're finasterde side-effects should go away if you're use s-equol and the DHT molecule is no longer able to bind to the receptor sites. Because you don't know if this effect won't trigger the same hormonal responses in the body as Finasteride does. Maybe you're body needs DHT to be able to produce a high sperm concentration? Maybe this is already studied? I don't know, I couldn't find a study of it. Next to that, I only see assumptions in this thread, and if it stays with assumptions in this thread, Folexen will be a very expensive Finasteride alternative. So please convince us with studies why Folexen is better ---> safer than finasteride. If you are able to do that, you're company will eventually be very successful .
Finasteride studies
Now i'm really wondering why s-equol should be better than finasteride. Why you're finasterde side-effects should go away if you're use s-equol and the DHT molecule is no longer able to bind to the receptor sites. Because you don't know if this effect won't trigger the same hormonal responses in the body as Finasteride does. Maybe you're body needs DHT to be able to produce a high sperm concentration? Maybe this is already studied? I don't know, I couldn't find a study of it. Next to that, I only see assumptions in this thread, and if it stays with assumptions in this thread, Folexen will be a very expensive Finasteride alternative. So please convince us with studies why Folexen is better ---> safer than finasteride. If you are able to do that, you're company will eventually be very successful .
Finasteride studies
Studie: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028211000161
Finasteride-induced secondary infertility associated with sperm DNA damage (2011)
Case report
A 48-year-old man with no prior medical or urologic history presented for evaluation of secondary infertility of 4 years’ duration. His wife had experienced four consecutive spontaneous abortions (after documented biochemical and/or clinical pregnancy) and to date they did not have a full-term pregnancy or live birth. His wife was 37 years old and had normal menses and a normal exam by her gynecologist.
The patient’s medications included zopiclone (a mild sleeping pill) and finasteride 1 mg for treatment of androgenic hair loss, which he had been taking for many years. The patient was a nonsmoker and consumed one glass of wine per day for many years. He had no history of exposure to hazardous materials, radiation, or heat. There was no history of sexually transmitted diseases or erectile dysfunction. Physical examination was unremarkable, with bilateral testes measuring 18 mL and normal location and firmness. The penis, epididymides, and vas deferens were normal. There were no varicoceles.
Semen analysis done a year before confirmed a normal volume of 1.6 mL, sperm concentration 53 × 106/mL, and motility 58%. The patient had a normal 46,XY karyotype. The sperm DFI was 30% at this time and was unchanged when repeated 2 months later. The patient was advised to stop finasteride. Three months later, the DFI decreased to 21% and subsequent DFI after another 3 months improved to 16.5%.
The Ethics Review Board at our institution approved the study. All information remained confidential.
Result(s)
The sperm DFI done a year earlier was 30%. This value was unchanged when repeated 2 months later. The patient was advised to stop finasteride. Three months after discontinuing the finasteride, the DFI decreased to 21% and subsequent DFI after another 3 months improved to 16.5%. To date, there is still no documented full-term pregnancy or live birth.
Conclusion(s)
The significant reduction in DFI within 3 months of finasteride cessation and continued improvement suggests a causal link between finasteride and sperm DNA damage. We hypothesize that low-dose finasteride may exert a negative influence on sperm DNA integrity, resulting in increased pregnancy losses. We suggest that in infertile men using finasteride, sperm DFI should be measured in addition to semen parameters, and a trial of discontinuation of finasteride may be warranted.
Discussion
Most reports of finasteride-associated infertility have studied the effects of finasteride on spermatogenesis in relation to semen parameters (1). The current literature does not report on the association between finasteride and sperm DNA damage. To our knowledge, the present case represents the first report of low-dose finasteride associated with increased sperm DNA fragmentation potentially contributing to recurrent pregnancy losses in the context of an otherwise normal semen analysis.
Finasteride is a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor that blocks the conversion of testosterone to its more potent form, dihydrotestosterone (DHT). In the United States and Canada, it is used at a higher dose (5 mg) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower dose (1 mg) for the treatment of androgenic hair loss. Earlier studies have shown that high-dose finasteride has been associated with a reversible decrease in sperm concentration and motility in normal men (2). Despite the decrease, the average sperm concentration was still adequate for normal fertility. The authors concluded that testosterone was essential for spermatogenesis and that DHT played no major role.
There have been only a few case reports and one randomized controlled trial on the effect of low-dose finasteride on spermatogenesis and infertility [1] and [3]. Amory et al. (2) randomized 99 men with normal semen parameters to receive dutasteride 0.5 mg, finasteride 5 mg, or placebo for 1 year. The outcome of the study showed that among young healthy men, finasteride 5 mg had a mild effect on spermatogenesis. Recent case reports have documented that finasteride 1 mg was associated with partially reversible impaired spermatogenesis in subfertile men or men with other contributing factors to infertility. In one case report of three patients, two patients had a varicocele and the third was obese (1). In another series of two patients, the authors suggested a causal relationship between the discontinuation of finasteride and the significant improvement in semen parameters within 3 months (3).
A systematic review of 11 studies demonstrated that the sperm DFI, an estimate of sperm DNA breaks, was significantly associated with increased risk for spontaneous abortions after IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) (4). A cutoff DFI of 27%–30% used by multiple studies has shown a statistically significant relationship with increased pregnancy losses. It has been theorized from animal studies that this association could be due to abnormal embryo development and impaired embryo implantation. The present case illustrates a patient on finasteride 1 mg for several years with normal semen parameters. This is in keeping with the fact that DHT is not as greatly affected by low doses of finasteride and that testosterone plays a more crucial role in spermatogenesis. It is possible that the high DFI (30%) contributed to the recurrent pregnancy losses in this couple, as has been observed for other couples undergoing IVF and ICSI. The significant reduction in DFI within 3 months of finasteride cessation and continued improvement thereafter suggests a causal link between finasteride and sperm DNA damage. We recognize that having a pretreatment sperm DFI would strengthen our observation, but sperm DFI, as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay, exhibits a low degree of biologic variability, and there were no other factors that could explain the substantial drop in sperm DFI. We hypothesize that low-dose finasteride may exert a negative influence on sperm DNA integrity resulting in increased pregnancy losses. Future studies should be done to investigate the relationship between finasteride and sperm DNA damage. We suggest that in infertile men using finasteride with normal semen parameters, a sperm DNA fragmentation index should be measured and a trial of discontinuation of finasteride may be warranted.
Studie: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028212004487
Garcia PV, Barbieri MF, Perobelli JE, Consonni SR, Mesquita SdFP, Kempinas WdG, Pereira LAV. Morphometric-stereological and functional epididymal alterations and a decrease in fertility in rats treated with finasteride and after a 30-day post-treatment recovery period. Fertil Steril 2012.
The mechanism of the adverse effects of finasteride on male fertility is poorly understood. This present study by Garcia et al. (1) on rats shows that finasteride causes changes in the structure and function of the epididymis, as well as reduced sperm function and fertility potential without any significant alterations in sperm production. Most importantly, the sperm was found to transit more quickly through the epididymis. The mechanism of this increased speed of transit through the epididymis is unknown. The authors postulated that the poorer sperm parameters and fertility potential in those rats treated with finasteride were due in part to the rapid transit through the epididymis. They conjectured that the shortened epidiymal transit time compromises the maturation of the sperm with a subsequent reduction in sperm function and fertility potential.
The epididymis plays a critical role in the maturation of sperm and the development of the sperm’s ability to fertilize (8). Abnormalities of epididymal function could lead directly to infertility. For example, the epididymal protein P34H is essential for sperm-oocyte binding and fertilization: absence or reduction of P34H is associated with infertility and poor oocyte binding/penetration. It is clear from the present study that a 5 α-reductase inhibitor could impact male fertility by altering the function of the epididymis, which could lead directly to altered sperm maturation and fertility potential. Interestingly, routine sperm tests (count, motility, morphology, and leukocyte count) would typically not identify men with altered sperm maturation or fertility potential.
This is a valuable publication since the article adds experimental weight to the limited literature suggesting that the use of finasteride could result in male infertility. With this report and the other published studies on the fertility effects of finasteride, it now seems reasonable to suggest that infertile men consider stopping finasteride. The other publications would indicate that the effects of finasteride on fertility are reversible. What remains unknown is if the effects on fertility are completely reversible.
Studie: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028210029250
Finasteride-associated male infertility
Result(s)
After cessation of finasteride, the patient’s semen volume increased immediately, and sperm concentration was up to more than 10 × 106/mL 16 weeks after stopping finasteride. He is now trying to achieve pregnancy by intrauterine insemination.
Conclusion(s)
Cessation of finasteride improved spermatogenesis and allowed the couple to attempt less-invasive fertility therapy. In this case, the patient had impaired spermatogenesis before he started the drug. In such patients, the drug may further decrease spermatogenesis. We suggest that drug cessation could be taken into consideration for infertile male patients with impaired semen parameters who are taking finasteride at a 1-mg dose.