billythekid
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 2
maybe it just kills hair to wherever you apply it and people are mistaking that for a shed.
Newbaldy84 said:that is a big question but how do you explain this. Once I started using this stuff on my beard it't getting thinner and thinner
Bryan said:Newbaldy84 said:that is a big question but how do you explain this. Once I started using this stuff on my beard it't getting thinner and thinner
I could tentatively explain it by saying that it's a systemic antiandrogenic effect.
dresden said:but if it is a systemic effect how come his beard only got thinner at the same spot he applied it?
philly said:Bryan, do you really think in your right mind that 1mg (in fact it's even less) of flutamide once daily is sufficient to systemically alter hormones so much as to thin out his beard so significantly? :uglylol:
Bryan said:philly said:Bryan, do you really think in your right mind that 1mg (in fact it's even less) of flutamide once daily is sufficient to systemically alter hormones so much as to thin out his beard so significantly? :uglylol:
No, but did he state how much of it he's applying?
Bryan said:The Great Unanswered Question about topical flutagel, which almost everybody on all the hairloss sites (except for me) is studiously ignoring: does flutagel really have a "local" antiandrogenic effect where it's applied? Two out of the three animal studies with topical flutamide (with the notable exception of the Sintov study) show little or no "local" effect. Is that record really good enough for the rest of you to consider using flutagel?
Newbaldy84 said:Bryan surely I could do that, then we would be 100% sure. I base my opinion on the fact that I was using flutagel on my head for a month or longer and didn't notice anything happening on my beard.
masculineyourheart said:Bryan said:The Great Unanswered Question about topical flutagel, which almost everybody on all the hairloss sites (except for me) is studiously ignoring: does flutagel really have a "local" antiandrogenic effect where it's applied? Two out of the three animal studies with topical flutamide (with the notable exception of the Sintov study) show little or no "local" effect. Is that record really good enough for the rest of you to consider using flutagel?
What method of application were they using for the flutamide in these studies?
masculineyourheart said:The issue in the past was supposedly that there hasn't been a decent enough vehicle for flutamide absorption which Sinere say they have solved by producing it in gel form.
Do you think the reason for 'little or no local effect' would be due to poor absorption of the flutamide or that it's simply not a potent enough antiandrogen?
When are you people going to realise that this is just another snake oil?