- Reaction score
- 40
Just report all these kind of trolling posts of which we've had a deluge recently. Hopefully that will lead to a ban.
Mods do nothing, unless you make a joke at the expense of Italians in which case you are banned instantly
Just report all these kind of trolling posts of which we've had a deluge recently. Hopefully that will lead to a ban.
No, their patent mostly talks about Androgenetic Alopecia, and that's the only NHP testing they did. In interviews the founder talks 99% about Androgenetic Alopecia, and even said that's the reason they wanted the drug. Their primary focus is male pattern baldnessam i the only one who finds it strange that AA seems to have quitr a secondary importance to them? in most papers of the mat3 anti body it is not even mentioned.
but many other conditions are such as prostate cancer, prostate hyperplasia etc. i think that is whx they got that much funding, to explore those routes, not necessarily because of AA and i would not be suprised if that is their least priority rn
Neutralizing prolactin receptor antibody Mat3 and its therapeutic use - Patent US-9777063-B2 - PubChem
US-9777063-B2 chemical patent summary.pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
abstract
Thats insane i wonder how many shots is required to go to this results.View attachment 170391
A reminder of why we are waiting for this antibody.
if that translates to humans its better than the cure i personally expected to ever happen. there must be some insane regenerative abilities involved there as its not just about arresting prolactin signaling, there must be restoration of previously dead or almost dead dermal papillas. we know this is possible with estrogen but its strange that this happened to the monkeys while they were still sndrogenic i suppose? and why is there no further minaturization upon cessation? there must be some permanent molecular changes to those cells that makes them less susceptible to dht?Thats insane i wonder how many shots is required to go to this results.
Btw you can see that there areas of regrowth werent slick bald but with thin hair meaning its no really the “cure as we expected..
I already told you guys not to expect it to reverse slick bald areas. We can very effectively create vellus hair with follica's protocol, making the combination a total solutionThats insane i wonder how many shots is required to go to this results.
Btw you can see that there areas of regrowth werent slick bald but with thin hair meaning its no really the “cure as we expected..
“O MNX, O+T dutasteride, 40mg estriol, erlotinib, microneedling monthly, RU58841, SAG, WAY-316606, PGE2, Eplerenone, Epitalon, Rapamycin, CHIR99021, bisindolylmaleimide, SW033291, Dinoprost, TB-500, BPC-157, Thymalin, Many supplements”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA man you are a desperate old balding f*** !
Damn that monkey is probably getting laid so much nowView attachment 170391
A reminder of why we are waiting for this antibody.
where did he say that?No, their patent mostly talks about Androgenetic Alopecia, and that's the only NHP testing they did. In interviews the founder talks 99% about Androgenetic Alopecia, and even said that's the reason they wanted the drug. Their primary focus is male pattern baldness
She. It was in Chinese media. I don't have the link. She basically said they founded HMI because of the hair growth in macaques. The other indications for the drug are just a bonus.where did he say that?
one part of me says this is amazing the other part remembers that its almost a natural law that hair loss research never pans out lol.. also why start with the endo trial first then?She. It was in Chinese media. I don't have the link. She basically said they founded HMI because of the hair growth in macaques. The other indications for the drug are just a bonus.
where did he say that?
The question is can it take those vellus hairs and make them terminal, or will it be more like finasteride where you can save some hairs that are not below a certain miniaturization threshold. If not, add this to the list of thing's that will mostly help the next generation.I already told you guys not to expect it to reverse slick bald areas. We can very effectively create vellus hair with follica's protocol, making the combination a total solution
i thibk the study answers that?The question is can it take those vellus hairs and make them terminal, or will it be more like finasteride where you can save some hairs that are not below a certain miniaturization threshold. If not, add this to the list of thing's that will mostly help the next generation.
Yes on monkeys. Doesn't mean it translates 1:1. I also swear that these monkey's dont go "bald" like humans do, so when the study references bald areas it means areas with a density under a certain number.i thibk the study answers that?
2028 provably lolSorry if this has been answered (and sorry if I've already asked this - I'm dumb), but when are results from the next phase of clinical trials expected?
Im getting janey vibes from u .. just spamming those threads for no reasons2028 provably lol