cyberprimate
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 14
Many people here are not using it despite it of the "Big 3". Why not ?
Timi said:why: minoxidil make my Heart damaged
my face full with water
big eyerings and a red burning face
become no air in my lungs
and was for my Hair a Killer
Timi
cyberprimate said:Any other reasons than side effects?
Maybe a more fundamental reason based on male pattern baldness theory ?
Bryan said:cyberprimate said:Any other reasons than side effects?
Maybe a more fundamental reason based on male pattern baldness theory ?
Other than the possibility of side effects (which I don't think are very common with topical minoxidil), there is what I think is the most important issue of all: It makes no sense to use minoxidil alone, for the obvious reason which I've been discussing on hairloss sites for years.
HT55 said:What bull ! I used liquid Rogaine 2% alone from 1993 to 1997 and got results
Bryan said:HT55 said:What bull ! I used liquid Rogaine 2% alone from 1993 to 1997 and got results
Goodness gracious! You were a really good responder and got excellent results, so that conclusively proves that everybody would have the same great results as you! :shock:
HT55 said:I never said "EVERYBODY " would but you say just the opposite which is complete BS
HT55 said:You don't think i can find many people who had results on Rogaine alone ?
Bryan said:I've been referring to the studies showing that minoxidil doesn't appear to interfere with the fundamental balding process. Do you believe those studies?
Bryan said:Of course you can find such people. So can I. A more important question here is what SPECIFICALLY do you mean by "had results".
HT55 said:Bryan said:I've been referring to the studies showing that minoxidil doesn't appear to interfere with the fundamental balding process. Do you believe those studies?
"doesn't appear" does not even give an answer
HT55 said:So if you can find people why would you make a statement saying minoxidil alone is basically a waste ?
HT55 said:We all know Prox n alone is a waste but that NEVER stops you from hyping it now does it ?
HT55 said:Oh and by "had results" I mean people who used rogaine alone and you can easilly tell they have more hair, kind of th e OPPOSITE of your missing Prox n photos
Bryan said:I don't know what you mean by that odd statement. And you didn't answer my question.
Bryan said:Prox-N is not a waste.
Bryan said:So having more hair is what you mean by "had results", even if it's gone shortly afterwards?
HT55 said:How can you have a study and come up with "doesn't appear" as your conclusion ? What exactly is that ?
HT55 said:So no I do not believe the study.
HT55 said:Bryan said:So having more hair is what you mean by "had results", even if it's gone shortly afterwards?
What is "shorty afterwords" ?
HT55 said:As i said I used Rogaine for 4 years alone and had more hair year 4 than when I started and I'm sure I'm not the only one
Bryan said:cyberprimate said:Any other reasons than side effects?
Maybe a more fundamental reason based on male pattern baldness theory ?
Other than the possibility of side effects (which I don't think are very common with topical minoxidil), there is what I think is the most important issue of all: It makes no sense to use minoxidil alone, for the obvious reason which I've been discussing on hairloss sites for years.