- Reaction score
- 339
There is nothing like insensitive hair to dht,there are degrees of sensitivity.
Transplanted hair follicles of bald men are not immune to balding ,they contains low androgen receptors and good dht drainage so they survives, but if bald person lives toward 100 he would be bald by that age .
People are so funny. They aren't immune! If you live to a 1,000 years old you will lose those hairs too! Ok, but for all intents and purposes they are immune in most people.
My donor area lost density over years.the false belief that androgenic alopecia only affect hairs on the top is misconception. It slowly kills all hairs if given enough time.Some people are like that. It sucks. For most people those hairs hardly thin until old age. I'm older than you, and my donor area hasn't miniaturized in the slightest.
Lipoinjection under the scalp?
where did u read Tsuji has billions ??? lmaoTsuji would be balancing billions of dollars of research towards a ‘cure’ on a hope that his transplanted cell hairs will just miniaturise.
where did u read Tsuji has billions ??? lmao
source?has been going since the mid noughties
Dude are you joking ? It’s being funded by the Japanese government and has been going since the mid noughties .
What theory? The whole theory is just replacing keyword "androgens" with "mechanical stress". Example, "follicles are genetically sensitive to androgens" is replaced with "follicles are genetically sensitive to mechanical stress".Why has this theory died out? Sounds legit to me and has observable evidence that i can see in daily life. For example, i've noticed that people with very similar skull shapes and bones placement to me, tend to lose in same pattern as me as well
This is a very interesting paper regarding the thickness of the skin on bald vs normal scalps
Error - Cookies Turned Off
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Because it doesnt apply to women for no reason and hair on the temporalis muscles can go completely bald and on the occipital ones can thin out significantly.Why has this theory died out? Sounds legit to me and has observable evidence that i can see in daily life. For example, i've noticed that people with very similar skull shapes and bones placement to me, tend to lose in same pattern as me as well
No sh*t. Bald scalps become thin because there is no more thick follicles in there. But that is the consequence not the cause.basically this study contradicts a previous study suggesting that thick skin is related to patterned hair loss. View attachment 168447
Why not the opposite though?No sh*t. Bald scalps become thin because there is no more thick follicles in there. But that is the consequence not the cause.
Go to a man which has all his follicles intact and measure his skin thickness as he is losing hair, you will see that skin gets thin parallel with hair loss meaning that its not first thin skin -> hair loss bat rather hair loss -> think skin. This study is comparing someone who is bald to someone who is not bald.Why not the opposite though?