"If I may suggest a follow on question that is very relevant:
Nobody has asked them yet about how close to a natural human hair is the best hair they can currently create right now.
In the last paper they published (years ago), they were using human iPSC to get the DP cells, but the epithelial cells were still taken from mice. And the hair didn’t look natural in the picture they provided (compared to a human hair). It was a breakthrough as a proof of concept, but we would expect that they are way ahead of that milestone nowadays.
My question is: if, as of now, they are able to produce a de novo hair with 100% human IPSC, and how close it looks to a real human hair (even if they can’t get their best result consistently yet).
I know they are probably won’t do it but if they could share with us a picture of what a de novo hair created with their tech currently looks like it would be amazing!"
Nobody has asked them yet about how close to a natural human hair is the best hair they can currently create right now.
In the last paper they published (years ago), they were using human iPSC to get the DP cells, but the epithelial cells were still taken from mice. And the hair didn’t look natural in the picture they provided (compared to a human hair). It was a breakthrough as a proof of concept, but we would expect that they are way ahead of that milestone nowadays.
My question is: if, as of now, they are able to produce a de novo hair with 100% human IPSC, and how close it looks to a real human hair (even if they can’t get their best result consistently yet).
I know they are probably won’t do it but if they could share with us a picture of what a de novo hair created with their tech currently looks like it would be amazing!"