Their best chance is to argue that it's psychologically debilitating and that this treatment will pave the way for cell-based treatments for other organs.Stemson wouldn't qualify for an innivation passport, its pretty clear. They have to fill the criteria, they fall at the first hurdle.
a) the condition is life-threatening or seriously debilitating or
b) there is a significant patient or public health need
Hair loss is not life threatening or seriously debilitating and despite what users on here think, there isn't a significant need for it within the public health sector.