Something That I Dont Understand About male pattern baldness

[ariel12160]

something that I dont understand in all the baldness issue it that our body needs hair .
he needs hair to protect the scalp from the sun , and it also need DHT for sex drive and another things ..
so it not making sense to me that i need to reduce something that give me healty sex drive and hormonal balance to get healty hair.
its like i need to cut my hand in order to succeed walking.
and another thing it the foliclle sensitivity to DHT , i mean why the hell a hair foliclle are sensitive and other hair foliclle 1 inch under isnt sensitive.
i know that i dont invest something new but it really dont make sense to me

 

[RegrowthPlease]

Since when does nature have to be logically accountable to u?

 

[ariel12160]

you can take it how you want but im sure that dht its not the root problem

 

[AnxiousAndy]

you can take it how you want but im sure that dht its not the root problem

Its probably not, if it was then finasteride would work 100% of the time! @IdealForehead made an excellent thread discussing what he thought was the root cause. I can't find the thread so you will need to go to his created threads to have a look yourself.

 

[ariel12160]

Its probably not, if it was then finasteride would work 100% of the time! @IdealForehead made an excellent thread discussing what he thought was the root cause. I can't find the thread so you will need to go to his created threads to have a look yourself.

you mean this thread ?
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...ttern-balding-androgens-are-secondary.113256/

 

[AnxiousAndy]

you mean this thread ?
https://www.hairlosstalk.com/intera...ttern-balding-androgens-are-secondary.113256/

That's it!

 

[crikey1980]

I think it's a evolution thing,the world is getting balder with every generation and has gone tenfold since the modern era helped with fatty diets.
I think in the future it will be rare too see a man with any hair.

 

[Mandar kumthekar]

Evolutionary theory suggest that beneficial trait pass down to next generation . but it is also true that many genes mutate in bad way and would persist in gene pool. Male pattern baldness is bad trait that has been persistent for millennia and natural selection had not worked against it. Bad luck. Mother nature is not perfect as we would wish her to be.

 

[disfiguredyoungman]

Because by time most man because to lose his hair, he already have made many children. So in evolution, the man has did his purpose for life already. You see? If average man is balding at age 30, that is not a problem because in "natural" world he already have nearly 20 years to make children by then. For purpose of evolution he already do his job. Now it is OK for nature to make his chram dead or make him ugly or make him with no energy etc. Evolution only care that he live long enough to have good chance of making children.

Shitty turkroach grammar, but yeah, basically evolutionary shadow at work. Premature hairloss is a very recent phenomena and for most of human history people would have already reproduced even by that age anyways, so it does not really matter what happens at that time. I actually predict that people with premature male pattern baldness will be rooted out of the genepool and future generations will bald later not earlier.