Hmm, I was thinking more of PGD2 and not cloning hair follicles.I'm optimistic, I reckon there will be a cure within the next 20 years. I reckon it will be cloning hair follicles though.
There will be a cure.
More money can be made by 'treating' something than a one step cure. Think about Gillette, how they made their fortune through disposable razors they made the customer have to keep coming back for more just like Rogaine and Propecia do once you stop any benefits you had are gone so you're basically their b**ch for life so the customer (us guys) have no power. Don't think for one second scientists are curing hair loss because they want to its financial incentives. If there is a supposed cure it wont be a one step procedure and BAM you have hair, it will be expensive multiple procedure deals, and this whole 5 year bull****, I was reading a thread of a guy saying better cures will be available in five years....it was from 2002!
More money can be made by 'treating' something than a one step cure. Think about Gillette, how they made their fortune through disposable razors they made the customer have to keep coming back for more
Please take off your tinfoil hat. Gillette do not make men grow facial hair, biology does. If a condition requires repeated application of a drug to adjust the expression of a protein (bar genetic engineering which is decades away)---that is just another fact of biology, not a conspiracy.
So what then do you attribute to the lack of reults in this field. Lack of money due to a lack of interest? Is the problem that complex or are we just not technically advanced enough yet, or both. Please, explain how this works... or in this case doesnt work.