Why would they compare it to minoxidil when they are clearly going down a "new mechanism" path of marketing? Even if it beat minoxodil in the trial they'd have pigeon holed themselves into the exact category you're pretending they're already in, another worthless money pit that hardly works. Except then it would be obvious to regular people as well and not a jr. hair scientist on a forum.You have to dig deeper into the study. Samumed top line results are misleading because they are a skeevy company that manipulates their trials. Allergan conducted a fair and honest trial head to head with minoxidil. Why was Samumed afraid to go head to head with minoxidil testing it with the same process they used to test SM? Because none of us would be here talking about it if they had. It would be obvious to all of you that it's worthless
It'd be a lose - lose situation.
