- Reaction score
- 4,506
Yes, but in gel form.what is that? Stemoxydine?
I also have minoxidil GEL from... follisomething but it is crazy because it is actual GEL FOR HAIR, it does not dry up.
Yes, but in gel form.what is that? Stemoxydine?
Yes, but in gel form.
I also have minoxidil GEL from... follisomething but it is crazy because it is actual GEL FOR HAIR, it does not dry up.
They're not the same process.
From what I understand, S5 Plus is weak, but it may have potential in combination therapy.
Man I'm starting to wonder if I should throw a topical anti-androgen into my regimen
Despite my success, the idea of actively balding again terrifies me, and I'm contemplating if this would be a worthwhile extra preventative measure
But the philosophy that someone should be on the minimum AA that is maintaining their hair also makes sense to me from a long term physiological stand point
Man I will have to think about this
But the philosophy that someone should be on the minimum AA that is maintaining their hair also makes sense to me from a long term physiological stand point
Man I will have to think about this
If you are on orals and its working...isn't it like over kill to add topical?
I think if you would take dutasteride from start you would maintain more and longer, rather than finasteride and when loosing its effect switch to dutasteride. But very interesting topic it would be androgen up-regulation vs accumulation of androgenetic effect.
Man I'm starting to wonder if I should throw a topical anti-androgen into my regimen
Despite my success, the idea of actively balding again terrifies me, and I'm contemplating if this would be a worthwhile extra preventative measure
But the philosophy that someone should be on the minimum AA that is maintaining their hair also makes sense to me from a long term physiological stand point
Man I will have to think about this
Man I'm starting to wonder if I should throw a topical anti-androgen into my regimen
Despite my success, the idea of actively balding again terrifies me, and I'm contemplating if this would be a worthwhile extra preventative measure
But the philosophy that someone should be on the minimum AA that is maintaining their hair also makes sense to me from a long term physiological stand point
Man I will have to think about this
Probably, yeah it might be completely unnecessary, but it's an angle I don't have covered in my regimen, and I was thinking about it as an extra preventative measure
I didn't want to cut off that much of my dht right off the bat if it wasn't necessary, although I am more than prepared to in the future if I start losing ground again, as even a minor amount of hair loss had significant quality of life effects on my social, emotional, and mental health.
That is a good question though to which I have no idea the answer to
@David_MPN ? We need some scientists here
Note that I can't track down where they wrote that spironolactone tackles hair loss from three different angles.
