to drop some reality on this thread. one can only take so much of the replicel/shiseido optimism, without empirical research to back it up.
to drop some reality on this thread. one can only take so much of the replicel/shiseido optimism, without empirical research to back it up.
thing that's shitty is we find pieces of the puzzle all the time but can't seem to put them all together its just turtles and mice allllll the way down.As in, research published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal? I think that we have to consider the overall context in which these claims are being made. Even 10 and 15 year-old promises for a legit treatment would not be that far off the mark if something is produced soon. We're living in a decade and era when not only are researchers looking at treatments for hair loss, the scientific community are saying they are on the cusp of developing cell-based and pharmaceutical treatments for hearing loss, cartilage, bone, muscle, tendon and liver repair, osteoarthritis, congestive heart failure and so on. Researchers have never really wavered from their efforts to figure out normal HF development and keratinocytes in order to better understand how cancer cells divide so rapidly.
In fact, so many peer-reviewed research papers on hair cycling have been produced that we probably shouldn't be surprised by announcements for new hair loss treatments in the near to mid term.
I bet it'll be on the injector. That seems to be their focus, yes?They say Replicel will be presenting *new* data on the congress event next week 27 to 30.
I don't think they have anything new to present (at least new to us).. Not for RCH-01, at least.
Any thoughts?
Makes sense.I bet it'll be on the injector. That seems to be their focus, yes?
They say Replicel will be presenting *new* data on the congress event next week 27 to 30.
I don't think they have anything new to present (at least new to us).. Not for RCH-01, at least.
Any thoughts?
They say Replicel will be presenting *new* data on the congress event next week 27 to 30.
I don't think they have anything new to present (at least new to us).. Not for RCH-01, at least.
Any thoughts?
Right. That could be it too.. well remembered, they still didn't released that one....Maybe the Five-year safety data of RCH-01?? we have the two-year safety data but not the other one...
Right. That could be it too.. well remembered, they still didn't released that one....
Humm. Or do we? Know i am not sure if the data they released early this year included the 5 year safety.....
Can somebody tell me what it is Shisiedo is actually in the process of developing? Is it a new treatment or procedure.. how effective is it looking at reversing and controlling hair loss?
I definitely recall them trialing it with multiple injections over a period of time. If the final product does indeed need multiple injections over time its gonna make it a lot more expensive for people flying outside of Japan to get it.Shiseido is co-developing RCH-01 (Replicel). In their trial Shiseido test 4 concentrations of autologous hair follicle dermal sheath cup cells .. Multiple injections ? maybe...
Interventions/Control_1 Higher cell concentration
Interventions/Control_2 Intermediate cell concentration
Interventions/Control_3 Lower cell concentration
Shiseido is co-developing RCH-01 (Replicel). In their trial Shiseido test 4 concentrations of autologous hair follicle dermal sheath cup cells .. Multiple injections ? maybe...
Interventions/Control_1 Higher cell concentration
Interventions/Control_2 Intermediate cell concentration
Interventions/Control_3 Lower cell concentration
