*copeThis seems to be the best hope
*copeThis seems to be the best hope
Why do you think that?*cope
Eat sh*t and die.This seems to be the best hope
Punched me right in the soulBro, you're 20 years old and balding. When I was 20 I was enjoying life with a NW0. How the f you go bald at 20? That's some real good genes you got there
Interesting shareIs this post by Dr. Rassman relevant here?
Prolactin levels and hair loss – WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog
baldingblog.com
Elevated prolactin levels in association with diffuse or androgenetic hair loss can be neglected as causative for the hair loss, because there is no evidence that they have an influence to the pattern
Irrelevant, it's been covered time and time again that we're targeting extrapituitary prolactin. Serum levels are meaningless.Is this post by Dr. Rassman relevant here?
Prolactin levels and hair loss – WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog
baldingblog.com
Elevated prolactin levels in association with diffuse or androgenetic hair loss can be neglected as causative for the hair loss, because there is no evidence that they have an influence to the pattern
Thanks for the response.Irrelevant, it's been covered time and time again that we're targeting extrapituitary prolactin. Serum levels are meaningless.
Is this post by Dr. Rassman relevant here?
Prolactin levels and hair loss – WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog
baldingblog.com
Elevated prolactin levels in association with diffuse or androgenetic hair loss can be neglected as causative for the hair loss, because there is no evidence that they have an influence to the pattern
What is known about the mole serum beyond just that he's working on it? Have there been any results released yet?Tbh Rassman is a good guy for giving hair transplant advice to young men on Reddit but nothing he writes about really belongs in the New Research section
Even his mole serum is... Meh
From what I understand, the expectation is that there would be no negative sides even if it did. There are drugs that are used for lowering PRL systemically and apparently sides are not a major concern.Even if you take it topically, would it not go systemic?
Not entirely sure about that.From what I understand, the expectation is that there would be no negative sides even if it did. There are drugs that are used for lowering PRL systemically and apparently sides are not a major concern.
Not heaps beyond what he and Plikus have divulged in interviews (podcasts, ISRH presentations). From what I understand they've isolated signalling factors from hair-producing moles and are planning on developing them for topical application. They have yet to speak of any results whether in vivo or not, planned clinical trials, nothing. They've already started lapsing on their expected timeline so I don't expect their company to produce anything groundbreaking in time for the next wave of promising treatments.What is known about the mole serum beyond just that he's working on it? Have there been any results released yet?
It's not microneedling alone which do Wound Induced hair follicle neogenesis. They used some chemicals to induce the neogenesis in addition to microneedling.Try reading cotsarelis studies. Microneedling creates de novo hair follicles.
It's called Minoxidil.It's not microneedling alone which do Wound Induced hair follicle neogenesis. They used some chemicals to induce the neogenesis in addition to microneedling.