parsi said:What's NW7?
2020 said:squeegee said:Prostaglandin is just one part of the problem..male pattern baldness is still driven by androgen.
so how did you cure your male pattern baldness? :whistle:
squeegee said:2020 said:squeegee said:Prostaglandin is just one part of the problem..male pattern baldness is still driven by androgen.
so how did you cure your male pattern baldness? :whistle:
So do you really think dumbass that Prostaglandin is the only factor in male pattern baldness? tell me why most female from our society don't have male pattern baldness? haahhahahah Prostaglandin is totally an old f****ing news... Androgen is the main factor in male pattern baldness. you cannot go around it.. and you question is so irrelevant.. hahaha damn troll..Prostaglandin is pretty much the inflammation factor.. this is why progenitor cells cannot migrate...
waynakyo said:Can someone chime in on what vehicle we would need with Ramatroban ?
I want to play with this
Garza and coauthors identified the receptor GPR44 to be responsible for mediating the negative effects of PGD2
mlouis said:Cody333 said:abcdefg said:Here is what I dont understand it says in the same article that Merck while testing a drug that does this sees no results for hair. So I mean if a drug they have in advanced testing doing this already shows no hair results what do we make of that?
-------------------------
Merck isn’t studying the anti-flushing drug in hair loss, said Ian McConnell, a Merck spokesman, in a telephone interview. “We haven’t seen any signals†in patient trials that the therapy might reduce baldness, he said.
Laropiprant (Merck's drug) selectively blocks the PD1 receptor - , that isn't the receptor that Cotsarelis was talking about. So Merck's drug won't be of any use to us. I posted a quote on page one of this thread from another forum explaining that.
It is also possible that an oral medicine does not provide an adequate dose to the follicle.
Ramatroban is a weaker CRTH2 inhibitor than Setipiprant but it is an inhibitor nonetheless. It has been prescribed for allergies in Japan for years. If it worked for hair orally i'm sure that would have been discovered by now. But topically perhaps?
Boldy said:prostaglandin d2 antagonist:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A novel DP(2) receptor antagonist (AM-461): a patent evaluation of WO2011085033.
WO2011085033
http://www.bioportfolio.com/resources/p ... on-Of.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22082220
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM211
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110163
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MK-7246
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20943773
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ramatroban
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15179446
I'm going to order this one very soon!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromoglicic_acid
Guys, Please stop waisting your time on this one. I have not even 1 clear study that show its spupresses or block the PGD2, GPR44 receptor, You guys cant confuse prostanglandins with Histamine! If someone can prove I'm worng with a study, please do!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We cant use cox2 blockers, because we will also reduce the pgE2 and pgF2... and we dont want that.
So Lets find a good PGD2, GPR44 antagonist!
Just found this intersting patent!:
http://www.google.com/patents/US2011002 ... &q&f=false
I'm Also very intersted in the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459
http://www.oxagen.co.uk/crth2-1.htm
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Stru ... 37014.html
ITs one of the most selective and effective out there (from my findings)
I will arrange custom synthesises These weeks..
I think this is better then ramatroban!
LooseItAll said:Boldy said:prostaglandin d2 antagonist:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A novel DP(2) receptor antagonist (AM-461): a patent evaluation of WO2011085033.
WO2011085033
http://www.bioportfolio.com/resources/p ... on-Of.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22082220
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM211
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110163
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MK-7246
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20943773
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ramatroban
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15179446
I'm going to order this one very soon!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromoglicic_acid
Guys, Please stop waisting your time on this one. I have not even 1 clear study that show its spupresses or block the PGD2, GPR44 receptor, You guys cant confuse prostanglandins with Histamine! If someone can prove I'm worng with a study, please do!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We cant use cox2 blockers, because we will also reduce the pgE2 and pgF2... and we dont want that.
So Lets find a good PGD2, GPR44 antagonist!
Just found this intersting patent!:
http://www.google.com/patents/US2011002 ... &q&f=false
I'm Also very intersted in the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459
http://www.oxagen.co.uk/crth2-1.htm
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Stru ... 37014.html
ITs one of the most selective and effective out there (from my findings)
I will arrange custom synthesises These weeks..
I think this is better then ramatroban!
Acutally from my understanding selective cox-2 inhibitors work by surpressing bad prostaglandins while leaving the good ones PGE and PGF. But hey can also cause some cardiovascular problems but I am not sure if that applies to them being used topically
I am considering topical Celebrex myself. About 3g/1ml of solvent two types a day about 3 ml. So that would give about 20 mg maybe less for safety per day.
Boldy said:LooseItAll said:Boldy said:prostaglandin d2 antagonist:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A novel DP(2) receptor antagonist (AM-461): a patent evaluation of WO2011085033.
WO2011085033
http://www.bioportfolio.com/resources/p ... on-Of.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22082220
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AM211
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22110163
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MK-7246
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20943773
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ramatroban
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15179446
I'm going to order this one very soon!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromoglicic_acid
Guys, Please stop waisting your time on this one. I have not even 1 clear study that show its spupresses or block the PGD2, GPR44 receptor, You guys cant confuse prostanglandins with Histamine! If someone can prove I'm worng with a study, please do!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We cant use cox2 blockers, because we will also reduce the pgE2 and pgF2... and we dont want that.
So Lets find a good PGD2, GPR44 antagonist!
Just found this intersting patent!:
http://www.google.com/patents/US2011002 ... &q&f=false
I'm Also very intersted in the CRTH2 antagonist OC000459
http://www.oxagen.co.uk/crth2-1.htm
http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Stru ... 37014.html
ITs one of the most selective and effective out there (from my findings)
I will arrange custom synthesises These weeks..
I think this is better then ramatroban!
Acutally from my understanding selective cox-2 inhibitors work by surpressing bad prostaglandins while leaving the good ones PGE and PGF. But hey can also cause some cardiovascular problems but I am not sure if that applies to them being used topically
I am considering topical Celebrex myself. About 3g/1ml of solvent two types a day about 3 ml. So that would give about 20 mg maybe less for safety per day.
NO,
supressing cox2, will also reduce PGE2! and other good prostaglandins like maybe PGF2a
If you do a cox2 inhibiator, you should ad topically PG2Fa, or PGE2. Like Bimatoprost.
squeegee said:You guys should overdose on 5-loxin.. Cheap and works really good..Inhibit pro-inflammatory leukotrienes and prostaglandins.