I never commented that it killed all my hopes about this lotion... how did you get that?
Nothing is wrong with me. I'm not against the lotion and like I said - I hope it works.
Why do people here get all mad when I suggest that there is a possibility that it's not going to be so great?
It's true, personally I care only about Androgenetic Alopecia (like many here, I think), but we don't have a lot of information about the effectiveness of the lotion - so here is something that appears to be a real testimony from someone who used it.
Some people base a lot of their hopes on some girl on fb we don't know much about. That post gives another possibility, that it didn't work for her, whether it's that girl or a different one.
I'll just ask:
Why in hell are you so worried about what happened to that particular girl, and you don't look at the table posted? That girl was the only one who did not have any results, out of 16 public participants + all the others which rights are owned by FIDIA. The doctor already said why the lotion did not work, and that's because it was (and presumably still is) a prototype; he clearly stated that, in the last interview, they had issues with preservatives and stability, and FIDIA was constantly updating their percentages and dosages, plus the lotion had to travel by plane to Sicily for her, and it was mid Summer.
After what we said and discussed, I still don't understand why in hell all the smallest and most insignificant negative hypothesis and details are here overfed by the users, plus forgetting all that we've been debating and all the explanation given, and this point is just one of many.
Fun fact is that people who believe in this lotion with cognition of cause and with strong reasons and explanations, are lately constantly trolled (not even talking of myself alone), with the CLEAR EXCUSE of "persuading other users to not jump on current treatments", which we NEVER SAID. And the funniest part comes when, for this constant trolling, people come in this thread, read only the last pages, and ticket this possible remedy as another scam, so they move along and never imagine of what can possibly offer this sideless upcoming treatment, and they stop reading, they stop informing, they stop planning their next possible updates on their regimen. You are doing quite the opposite of what you are preaching. Then I read Replicel's thread and I see the amount of likes (in the sense of agreements) had the user who said to have faith (when they just changed randomly, without giving explantions or reasons, the date of expected data from Shiseido from Q4 to Q2), and then people who say this in this thread are accused of false optimism, or trying to manipulate other user's regimen. I am here to discuss SERIOUSLY, and not to feed random trolls.
But maybe a lot of you find easier to say that this is a scam just to pretend, later, to have being right all the time.
That's the only explanation of this constant circling around the points already made, and the constant evading of the logical explanation provided by the doctor himself (not certainly me, that I am nobody!!), and the constant search of details, conjectures, that can predict bad things.
If now only the negative and pessimists users remained, there is no need to discuss anything, because you already predicted how it is going to end, and clearly ignoring all the explanations already given (such when talking about the effectiveness on AA only thinking about the artist or this young little girl and forgetting the entire trial ).
Have fun having no fun.
