follicle84
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 7
Since 2002. Thats pretty good if you've been holding the fort that long especially if your still seeing results. Congrats to you mate, i guess your like me and wont give up on your hair without a big fight. I did get a little regrowth with minoxidil and finasteride originally, but nothing impressive im still losing the big fight but i strongly believe thats about to change.
Speaking about proxiphen i was very close to buying it and it does sound good. However upon much research i discovered theirs sod's in hairsignals and thought that proxiphen may not be necessary. The question is how much sod's are in hair signals and proxiphen. Im betting proxiphen has more since its mostly sod based. If cost isnt an issue i think proxiphen would be a great addition to get that little bit extra boost in results. If not i think hairsignals may be enough for what you need providing your already using minoxidil. I would sooner rather go for the nano shampoo however rather than the proxiphen cream. Reason being is that it i think it will be much easier to fix into a regimen than the cream since we are already using various creams and spray based applications. Too much i think may get messy. Further more i've heard this nano thing in the shampoo is something else entirelly that may benefit against hairloss. Then again proxiphen does contain spironolactone so it may still be a usefull addition to include if you can afford it. However with hairloss you cant take chances and its best to get the most you can for the least amount of money.
For me im adding L-Arginine and GliSODin as an oral sod to futher boost my sod in take and results. I think the sod's in topicals dont completelly penetrate the scalp to give you the full benefits. At least with an oral intake of sod's your gauranteed to get the most out of them. Furthermore as well as being an anti oxidant i've heard they have a slight vasilodator effect similair to minoxidil but without the side effects also their natural. Just my thoughts anyways. Good look with your results mate im sure you'll have great success with that killer regimen. Keep up the good work.
Speaking about proxiphen i was very close to buying it and it does sound good. However upon much research i discovered theirs sod's in hairsignals and thought that proxiphen may not be necessary. The question is how much sod's are in hair signals and proxiphen. Im betting proxiphen has more since its mostly sod based. If cost isnt an issue i think proxiphen would be a great addition to get that little bit extra boost in results. If not i think hairsignals may be enough for what you need providing your already using minoxidil. I would sooner rather go for the nano shampoo however rather than the proxiphen cream. Reason being is that it i think it will be much easier to fix into a regimen than the cream since we are already using various creams and spray based applications. Too much i think may get messy. Further more i've heard this nano thing in the shampoo is something else entirelly that may benefit against hairloss. Then again proxiphen does contain spironolactone so it may still be a usefull addition to include if you can afford it. However with hairloss you cant take chances and its best to get the most you can for the least amount of money.
For me im adding L-Arginine and GliSODin as an oral sod to futher boost my sod in take and results. I think the sod's in topicals dont completelly penetrate the scalp to give you the full benefits. At least with an oral intake of sod's your gauranteed to get the most out of them. Furthermore as well as being an anti oxidant i've heard they have a slight vasilodator effect similair to minoxidil but without the side effects also their natural. Just my thoughts anyways. Good look with your results mate im sure you'll have great success with that killer regimen. Keep up the good work.