There should be another quackwatch to monitor Quackwatch. They are often more wrong than right, in the face of not only scientific evidence, but anecdotal stories to the contrary -- including the many elderly who are currently being prescribed HGH. They are also completely wrong in this instance too. The reason, however, is a lot more complex than could be explained here. Or maybe I've just gotten tired of wasting my energy. Peeps like CCS are going to continue to learn the hard way. But Google is your friend.
Also look for my posts in this forum about alternatives to HGH, or agonists. They may be less effective, and more involved a process, but they're also FAR more inexpensive and safe.