Bobmer,
YOU are the one selling an E-book. Bryan doesn't sell anything.
Im pretty sure I can answer your position on male pattern baldness increasing as industrialization does and it is one word, diet.
Pre-WW2 Japanese ate alot of soy (isoflaovnes, equol, genistien, daidzien)---lower DHT levels, inhibition of PKC, "bound" DHT , drank green tea (ECGC) Inhibits type one alpha five strongly, type two weakly, mild receptor blockage, inhibits TNF-alpha and TGF beta 1 and 2, rice (more sterols in rice bran oil than any other substance, hence some anti-androgenic activity), ate ALOT of fish (fish oil inbibits TNF-alpha, an inflammatory cytokine asssoicated with immune response, at alot of veggies rich in vitamins, silica, various plant sterols................
vs.
Eating alot of insulin-resistance building high glycemic index processed foods and sugars which get the adrenals to pump out more testosterone and DHT (the alpha five reductase type one enzyme is in the adrenal gland also), high glycemic index diets are pro-inflammatory also and will see more inflammatory cytokine production as well as more androgens in the skin.
In conclusion, its not only what they are NOW eating, but what they dont eat anymore so much (especially soy products and green tea) is why more younger men in the far East are seeing their hair thin at earlier ages.
All of this together is more powerful than we probably give it credit to be. Ive seen a few young hispanics and one Asian in particular with thinning hair and acne (the Asian was overweight) and it struck me that this was rare amongst those subsets in the past. Diets are a big thing. These were young people who didnt work in factories and the area Im in doesnt have many industrial enterprises anyway, so there is no way pollution from chimneys is screwing with their hormones here.
All this stuff is moot up to a point Bobmer. I just read about a company called Anaderm that is about to test a topical that will degrade androgen receptors in targeted tissue areas. Thus a real preventive cure to baldness might be available in just a few years because your hair will not have androgen receptors and will be like a woman's hair. Hair Cloning is getting closer to reality as ICX is in phase two trials right now and (somewhat overenthusiatically in my opinion) plans to have a Hair Multiplication protocol from cultured dermal papillas (the person's own) on the market by 2010 (but probably a couple of years later than that in my opinion). So one day, if your hairline is a tad high for your liking, you will be able to "make" more hair to lower it.
Every once in a while a "hippie" type comes into the hairloss forums and declares baldness is just "big pillows, TV sets, electromagnetic waves, poor circulation, modern stress, shampoo (get that one alot), hot shower water, chlorinated shower water, etc.". You have added industrial society, chairs, and a few other vague things.
But you added all of them based on a false premise that is disprovable. Lack of androgens. ...You contended based on a false premise that removal of androgens didn't stop further baldness. This is incorrect. Removal of androgens does indeed stop further baldness and will regrow a little of what is lost, especially if one is young. That increase in haircounts with finasteride in the first two years would be permanent if all androgens were removed. At any rate, the loss of hair thereafter is very slow and nothing like the loss of hair with a placebo.
I hope you make an attempt to quantitatively test your theory however with photographic documentation.
I resent you calling Bryan a snake oil merchant. Ive never seen him try and sell anything, but he's given a favorable opinion of tricomin, fatty acids, sprio, finasteride, dutasteride, ketoconazale, NANO, prox-n, RU58841, minoxidil, the possibliltiy that the various peptides in folligen might help, and retin-A. Ive never heard him claim anything unproven might help. Ive never seen him try and sell anything. Bryan has a high opinion of Proctor's products, but Bryan has proof they work (his two year photo of prox-n success is in the photo gallery of this website in which he got successful results with no anti-androgens at all in his forties, which is impressive). Bryan is a mathematician by trade and has no affiliation with anyone in the hairbiz. Ive disagreed with Bryan before, and have different political convictions than he does, but he's not tried to "snake oil" anyone on HairLossTalk.com in the years Ive read it.