bornthisway
Established Member
- Reaction score
- 9
Wasn't the problem with RUM there was no good vehicle? Or have things changed?
They are never going to release RU. One of the researchers said that it demasculinized an animals pups if it was applied to the pregnant animal for too long. So teratogenicity is one possible reason why it will never be released. It's a strong antiandrogen that is absorbed topically. That can cause birth defects to developing young. Also the company that acquired it simply probably didn't have hairloss as a primary interest and that there was no real market potential for another potentially sexual side effect inducing antiandrogen thats a pain in the *** to apply when propecia can just be taken orally with no fuss
.
It is naive to think that regular RU would have no side effects. If it had none, then there would have been no need for them to come up with RU Myristate.
They are never going to release RU. One of the researchers said that it demasculinized an animals pups if it was applied to the pregnant animal for too long. So teratogenicity is one possible reason why it will never be released. It's a strong antiandrogen that is absorbed topically. That can cause birth defects to developing young. Also the company that acquired it simply probably didn't have hairloss as a primary interest and that there was no real market potential for another potentially sexual side effect inducing antiandrogen thats a pain in the *** to apply when propecia can just be taken orally with no fuss
.
In my extensive review of RU I have not once come across the claim that "one of the researchers" reported malformed pups. All published papers show no change in hormone levels.
"No systemic effects were detected." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9798729
" devoid of antiandrogenic activity on deep accessory sex organs and of any effect on testosterone level " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8136306
"Penetration/permeation studies carried out using the Franz diffusion cell proved only negligible permeation of reconstructed epidermis and excised porcine skin within 6 h, implying a more topical action of the drug." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15700772
Propecia can be taken orally with no fuss? Tell that to all the guys who report libido and erectile issues.
I really want to see a reference for your claim about deformed pups.
Wasn't the problem with RUM there was no good vehicle? Or have things changed?
Not all research gets published. It's from a private communication between Dr Hideo Uno, who did research with RU, and a forum member... from over a decade ago. You can either believe it or not.:
"RU58841, topical formulation, is not entirely safe; if application continued too much, anti-androgenic effect appears. This was done in pregnant rabbit, topical application of RU58841 produced demascularization of pups. No data available in male pattern baldness human. My studies on monkeys showed no shrinkage of the prostate (by MRI) but reduction of lobular size occurred in the seminal vesicles."
http://www.hairlosshelp.com/forums/messageview.cfm?catid=10&threadid=26207
- - - Updated - - -
This is the general consensus. Nothing has changed. One member ferox claims he has a german chemist working on a modern lipid nanoparticle vehicle for topical finasteride. This kind of vehicle would be ideal for RU-myristate, because it is the only one which was used to demonstrate its prodrug effect.
These buys are NOW CLOSED, brothers. Everything is currently being produced, and we can't sign anyone else into these buys.
We just want to say thanks to everyone who joined in and held up their commitment, and sorry to everyone who expressed their interest too late.
It is naive to think that regular RU would have no side effects. If it had none, then there would have been no need for them to come up with RU Myristate.
They are never going to release RU. One of the researchers said that it demasculinized an animals pups if it was applied to the pregnant animal for too long. So teratogenicity is one possible reason why it will never be released. It's a strong antiandrogen that is absorbed topically. That can cause birth defects to developing young. Also the company that acquired it simply probably didn't have hairloss as a primary interest and that there was no real market potential for another potentially sexual side effect inducing antiandrogen thats a pain in the *** to apply when propecia can just be taken orally with no fuss
.
there is no point to using it topically. every study with topical 5arI show they go systemic and have the same effect on hormonal levels.Actually, they can't touch finasteride. They can probably touch dutasteride lol mainly because dutasteride is in a gel cap usually and it's molecular weight is 527 Daltons when the limit for skin absorption is 500...I know this because I'm trying to figure out how to use dutasteride topically haha
there may be a second group buy.
I can't PM, I don't know why
The ****ing random questions keep failing for me, and I assume I can't PM because I'm newly registered