Sanchez1234
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 311
In the seti trials the dosage is 2000mg, in the fevi trials the dosage is 150mg. I've read on HairLossTalk.com that people assume that fevipiprant is 13x times more potent. But is there any scientific proof that fevipiprant is much more potent? Different dosage between two different chemicals for two differente 'diseases' doesnt proof anything.
And we are also assuming that fevi will work for hairloss. Is thery any proof? No sides of hairloss are mentioned in the trial.
If fevi is much better than seti, why isnt being trialed for hairloss anyway?
Ps: i was talking to LUO about Darolutamide i am using and he asked me if i would be interested in fevi. I am not at this stage but he said a few people asked him if he could make it. He said he has studied Fevipiprant, and is sure he can produce it. He will start to synthesize it in the next week. It will need 5-6 weeks to finish the synthsis.
And we are also assuming that fevi will work for hairloss. Is thery any proof? No sides of hairloss are mentioned in the trial.
If fevi is much better than seti, why isnt being trialed for hairloss anyway?
Ps: i was talking to LUO about Darolutamide i am using and he asked me if i would be interested in fevi. I am not at this stage but he said a few people asked him if he could make it. He said he has studied Fevipiprant, and is sure he can produce it. He will start to synthesize it in the next week. It will need 5-6 weeks to finish the synthsis.