- Reaction score
- 984
It is Time to Start the Trial NOW !
me too haha xDI need some good hairloss news for my mental health
There are different promoters for ePRL and it's not even understood yet what they all are. Dopamine only regulates pituitary prolactin.Honestly most of us should look forward more for SMI-1 ( Assuming it works in the same way in the long run ) to reach the grey market and be available reliably than this, as it will probably be extremely expensive.
Also any reason why we can't rub Cabergoline on our scalp? Is the mode of production of extrapituary prolactin different from regular PRL?
This has been answered a thousand times.Honestly most of us should look forward more for SMI-1 ( Assuming it works in the same way in the long run ) to reach the grey market and be available reliably than this, as it will probably be extremely expensive.
Also any reason why we can't rub Cabergoline on our scalp? Is the mode of production of extrapituary prolactin different from regular PRL?
But isn't SMI a competitive antagonist?This has been answered a thousand times.
Per the BAY patent, competitive antagonists of the receptor are ineffective in the hair follicle because concentrations of prolactin are too high since it's produced within the hair follicle, and prolactin has a higher binding affinity for the receptor than the antagonists.
The BAY antibody is a non-competitive inhibitor, meaning that it doesn't have to outcompete prolactin for receptor binding. It can bind to the receptor along with prolactin and still silence it.
Therefore caber wouldn't work. I believe it's not sure yet whether SMI-1 will work on the long run.
It sure is.But isn't SMI a competitive antagonist?
I know, my question was a way to ask about extrapituary prolactin specifity.It sure is.
Per the BAY patent:
"competitive PRLR antagonists are not effective in neutralizing local PRL signaling in the hair follicle due to their negative characteristics..."
It seems SMI does not feature these negative characteristics but again, I am not convinced it will work.
About caber, many people have used it in the past and it'd be known if it were working.
SMI is effective in neutralizing local PRL signaling in murine breast tissue at leastIt sure is.
Per the BAY patent:
"competitive PRLR antagonists are not effective in neutralizing local PRL signaling in the hair follicle due to their negative characteristics..."
It seems SMI does not feature these negative characteristics but again, I am not convinced it will work.
About caber, many people have used it in the past and it'd be known if it were working.
Hey Pegasus, how are your gains? Can you share some feedback from discord group - how are others doing on SMI? Pics would be lovely.SMI is effective in neutralizing local PRL signaling in murine breast tissue at least
Hey Pegasus, how are your gains? Can you share some feedback from discord group - how are others doing on SMI? Pics would be lovely.
Wonder if we could contact her and ask about trials?和其瑞医药联合创始人肖瑞平:医药强国,吾辈使命 - 创新人才 - 南京生物医药谷
· 和其瑞医药有限公司联合创始人、董事长兼首席执行官;· 北京大学讲席教授,北大分子医学研究所所长;· 《新英格兰医学期刊》副主编www.njbpv.cn
That would be very nice! Are you able to contact her. I am from Germany and contacted several employes at Bayer Bit they Werent able to say anythingWonder if we could contact her and ask about trials?
Where did you find this?Did anyone post this before?The upper one is male monkey and the below one is female.
It‘s on the Wechat webpage of Peking University where professor Xiao Ruiping works.Where did you find this?
Nice find. Is there anything else there? If I am seeing this right it does look these monkeys were basically cured in 6 months, and probably would be totally cured in a year. The trichoscope appears to show regression six months after treatment is discontinued, but no further regression until after the two year mark. By year 4 there appears to be more regression. The picture after 28 weeks of treatment appears to show a nearly full head of hair. If they kept on treatment long enough for it to grow out then they may well be fully cured. These pictures indicate to me that HMI-115 turns every tiny vellus hair into a thick, terminal hair. These pictures represent the best-case scenario anticipated from analyzing the data. This is phenomenal!Did anyone post this before?The upper one is male monkey and the below one is female.
This is seriously exciting. Great find, thanks!Did anyone post this before?The upper one is male monkey and the below one is female.
Did anyone post this before?The upper one is male monkey and the below one is female.