HairlossTalk
Senior Member
- Reaction score
- 7
Re: so many comments to be made
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/newsletter/ ... le&sid=111
"data presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. The new study showed a difference of 277 hairs in a one-inch diameter circle of scalp in favor of men treated with Propecia for five years (n=219) vs. those who received a placebo (n=15). Baseline hair counts of all men at the start of the study averaged 876 hairs in the one-inch diameter circle. "This study provides new, long-term scientific data that Propecia helped the majority of men with predominantly vertex male pattern hair loss keep the amount of hair they have," said Keith Kaufman, M.D., senior director, Clinical Research, Merck Research Laboratories."
Another article for you to review on this:
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/newsletter/ ... le&sid=110
Unfortunately, none of your replies gave an acceptable answer to my questions as to why you're overcharging for something people can get somewhere else for cheaper, with the same clinical data.
Therefore the criticisms people gave regarding cost versus benefit are in my opinion still valid.
Here is the situation. You guys have good intentions, I do believe. You're not promoting bunk products like Hair Genesis or Nisim or Fabao. For that, thank you. But the problem is, as Dr. Lee himself found, you can't set up a physical shop in a shopping mall and call it a "Hair loss Treatment" center, simply because there isn't anything *WORTH* charging for. Ive thought about doing this many times here in San Diego. I thought - "I run a huge site on hair loss. Maybe I can put together a little store that people can come in to". But it took me all of 15 seconds to realize that the cost of doing so would outweigh the profit. What consumers need is *education* and *information*. This can be obtained online for free, on sites like these. Aside from that, neither you nor I have really anything to offer anyone. Once they've been empowered with the information, they can just go to the store and treat their own hair loss quite cheaply. Thats just the way it is unfortunately.
HairLossTalk.com
This seems contradictory. You just said nobody will do a clinical trial for saw palmetto because it can't be patented. Why are there hundreds of clinical trials on Saw Palmetto for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?bonric said:Firstly regarding Saw Palemtto yes I agree that there is not a clinical study for hairloss treatment (as this product cant be patented nobody is going to do one either), however there has been alot of trials for Prostate treatment using Saw Palmetto.
Yes, more effective at reducing the size of the Prostate. Just because it does this does not mean its more effective at affecting serum levels to a significant enough amount so as to help hair loss.bonric said:It has been established that 320 mg of Saw Palmetto is more effective than finasteride on DHT levels in these trials
You can't use this logic with drugs. The prostate is different than the hair. It is not logical to make the statement "If it works for the prostate, it must work for the follicle on the scalp." You could only make this conclusion if trials successfully showed that to be true, and they have not. I sat literally 2 feet from Angela Christiano as she pulled out one of the biggest saw palmetto hair loss study data results from her locked filing cabinet (the results that nobody has been allowed to see, and were not published). She told me point blank, the saw palmetto did nothing, and they had trial data and even photographs over a period of 6 months of the follicle. It had no effect. It didn't work. They did try. This is a big reason why I am so adimant about SP not working, until some more convincing data comes out.bonric said:(it works for the prostate) so logically it should do the same for hairloss
The Merck Propecia 5 year trial data does not show a 50% failure rate at the 5th year mark. Here are the actual percentages:bronic said:Now as I believe that most of you are fairly well versed in this industry you would be aware that finasteride starts failing in 50% of cases after 5 years of usage.
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/newsletter/ ... le&sid=111
"data presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. The new study showed a difference of 277 hairs in a one-inch diameter circle of scalp in favor of men treated with Propecia for five years (n=219) vs. those who received a placebo (n=15). Baseline hair counts of all men at the start of the study averaged 876 hairs in the one-inch diameter circle. "This study provides new, long-term scientific data that Propecia helped the majority of men with predominantly vertex male pattern hair loss keep the amount of hair they have," said Keith Kaufman, M.D., senior director, Clinical Research, Merck Research Laboratories."
Another article for you to review on this:
http://www.hairlosstalk.com/newsletter/ ... le&sid=110
I do not believe this to be good logic either. This is a huge assumption that cannot be accurately made.bronic said:This has not happened with our patients so we can fairly well assume that it is the Saw Palmetto that is maintaining the results.
The study did not show that finasteride CAUSES aggressive cancer. It showed that those WITH aggressive types of cancer already, can end up agitating and accelerating it with Finasteride. Further, it had NO effect on those with cancer types that were not considered aggressive. Finasteride does not cause cancer, of any kind.bronic said:With taking into the equation that 5 mg of finasteride is showing problems with causing more aggresive types of prostate cancer
Dr. Lee offers the same product, in effect, in Xandrox, with RetinA for $39 a month, and that's after his markup. Id be willing to bet that it costs him roughly $20 to produce.bronic said:This is one of the reasons that we can have a 7% minoxidl with .01%retinoic acid is that it is manufactured one bottle at a time by a qualifeid pharmacist with a degree in compounding. Please ask your local pharmacist to produce the same and you will see what sort of costs we are talking about.
I wasn't asking about trials for 5% minoxidil with RetinA. I was asking about trials on your 7% solution with Retin A. You claimed that *your* solution had data behind it but Dr. Lee's 12% and 15% did not. If you're talking about trials showing increased absorption with RetinA then yes, Dr. Lee has the same trials to point to that you do.bronic said:Now with the clinical studies on the minoxidil, there is clinical trials listed in the American Dermatolgy Journal that by using retinoic acid it increases the absorption of minoxidil by three fold. The problem with normal 5% strength is that a high level of it sits on the scalp. The trials that were performed on a hair count basis are available for viewing at any of our centres.
Unfortunately, none of your replies gave an acceptable answer to my questions as to why you're overcharging for something people can get somewhere else for cheaper, with the same clinical data.
Therefore the criticisms people gave regarding cost versus benefit are in my opinion still valid.
Here is the situation. You guys have good intentions, I do believe. You're not promoting bunk products like Hair Genesis or Nisim or Fabao. For that, thank you. But the problem is, as Dr. Lee himself found, you can't set up a physical shop in a shopping mall and call it a "Hair loss Treatment" center, simply because there isn't anything *WORTH* charging for. Ive thought about doing this many times here in San Diego. I thought - "I run a huge site on hair loss. Maybe I can put together a little store that people can come in to". But it took me all of 15 seconds to realize that the cost of doing so would outweigh the profit. What consumers need is *education* and *information*. This can be obtained online for free, on sites like these. Aside from that, neither you nor I have really anything to offer anyone. Once they've been empowered with the information, they can just go to the store and treat their own hair loss quite cheaply. Thats just the way it is unfortunately.
HairLossTalk.com
