First up Kyriakin, don't take any of this the wrong way, I don't mean to insult you, just give you the facts as I see 'em
Left hand picture:
Preening, self obsessed, affected effeminate head tilt, picture taken in stairwell of piss drenched run down inner city estate.
Right arm out stretched holding the camera, as this guy has no friends around.
very very grey. slightly scary.
Right hand picture:
Same guy, strong looking sort, waiting for his flight to be called at Berlin airport, photo taken by his mate Paul, both are on the way to Japan to DJ / Start work on a new film / solve world poverty.
bit of colour.
Kyriakin, you are a good looking guy, but you looked a bit 'cheap boy band' before you shaved your hair, you look a load better after, drop the pouting, that may have suited your old look, but it makes you look homosexual now :freaked: .
Kyriakin said:
We're heterosexual men. We see beauty and attractiveness in 'pretty' women. An attractive woman to us is one with long hair, and a very feminate look. As a result, these are the only attractive features that a heterosexual man can see in another man (or yourself). We can only see attractiveness in a man who is feminine-looking, with long, flowing hair, because it closely matches what we see in women
this is a very generalized and vague overview of attraction, I will not even attempt to sum up cross-gender attraction in a single post, but suffice to say that a males attraction to a female is concentrated almost entirely (especially in the very early stages of attraction) on physical attributes.
A females attraction to a male is much more diffuse, taking in a broader range of attributes.
There are very clear evolutionary reasons for this difference.