- Reaction score
- 686
everyone who is pretending to know something for sure is an idiot. Why do you care about his opinion so much?
2020, Hairloss Cures Or Just New Treatments?
- Thread starter Dhldan
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 1,132
IIRC Phase 1 results showed maintenance and a 10-15% average increase in h/cm² in total, for 24 months, achieved by a single session...you're right, this is amazing, but i wouldn't call that 'many' regarding existing treatments use frequencies
And you don't get to mess with your hormones
Yes, that’s true, but with stem cells there’s still the possibility of them dying off early on. The 24 months with 1 injection is amazing don’t get me wrong, but it may not be the case for all of us as it’ll vary. You’re right though, 1 injection every 2 years isn’t many. An injection every 6 months is though imo.
We won’t know for sure until Phase 2 results release. Hopefully soon bc I’m diffuse thinning and my hairline’s starting to get awfully close to the NW2 mark.
From a perspective of a noob here:
Phase 1 consists of 19 people
+ 1 shot of super-high dose and the regrowth was 5%-20%, which last for 2 years and the regrowth wears off after 5 years. So re-injection play an important roles here.
+ are they sure that the "original" cells are the best and healthy and DHT-resistant, could be that the "original" cells are not the healthy one ?
+ can they test and assure that all the "replicated" cells are alive, fully functional ? I mean, some kinds of quality control and assurance here
Phase 2 consists of 66 people, not sure if that would change the statistics significantly ?
And well, there are many factors along the whole process that can affect the results significantly
I can’t give you a definitive answer as none of us know what they’re doing right now, but I’m sure they’re getting the best hairs possible. With technology now like neograft and etc we know which hair follicles are prime. They probably took hairs from the donor area anyways.
As far as testing the replicated cell goes I think they’re just basing that off the results rather than going into depth with it. Basing this off the phase 1 statistics they gave us.
I myself think that phase 2 results will be better than phase 1 by 10%. I think the average will be 15% regrowth and the best responders will have somewhere around 25-30%. If the phase 2 results dont beat phase 1 then that’d be disappointing.
Btw, not all follicle in the donor area is "strong" and DHT-resistant, it is my concern since if we did it wrong from the start (take the bulllshit follicle) then everything is down the drain.
My wild guess is that, lower dose + multiple injections (phase 2) = 1x super-high-dose (phase 1), but response rate in phase 2 would be much much higher and uniform
Last edited:
Yea, but like neograft which can pinpoint the best follicles from the donor area, im sure replicel’s capable of doing the same. Anyways I’m not sure if the dermal sheath cup cells which are injected need to b dht resistant or have a property like so bc they aren’t hair follicles themselves or anything. Sure they should still take them from the healthier follicles tho. Either way I think just having the extra dscc bind to other cells and follicles would aid in regrowth and thickening. Maybe it’ll reduce their lifespan (stem cells/dscc) and be the cause for requiring more injections though.
- Reaction score
- 460
- Reaction score
- 1,132
Again, IIRC Phase 2 will have a different injections protocol, more injections at a higher frequency
My bad, 'had' a different protocol, still waiting for Shiseido results
My bad, 'had' a different protocol, still waiting for Shiseido results
- Reaction score
- 288
Again, IIRC Phase 2 will have a different injections protocol, more injections at a higher frequency
My bad, 'had' a different protocol, still waiting for Shiseido results
Don't get your hopes up Shiseido is the equivalent of Brotzu
infinitepain
Experienced Member
- Reaction score
- 357
New copes.
Hi, It seems like something like that is already out which is using stem cells. Apparently it's offered in Singapore, UAE and a few other places.
It's called Regenera Activa. I will be interested to hear of the results in the coming months/years.
Sounds similar to rch-01, although not the same. I’d like to see more data and studys + before and after pics. Looks rlly interesting.
- Reaction score
- 521
I live in Singapore and I might give this a try.
What the f***. Where are these places coming from? First Hair Clone pops out of someone's *** and now this. Wtf? Not complaining but wow.
According to Lohn John Silver, Replicel's goal for a "success" is a measly 5% regrowth. I think they should easily beat that and get it out to market.
- Reaction score
- 686
Gas-station sushi is woth the diarrea!
- Reaction score
- 115
Although that particular clinic looks a bit sus, Singapore’s healthcare service is quite advanced..